Impact films take aim at social sector
Ruby Kraner-Tucci
Impact films are claiming their stake of the social sector, competing for the same funding, platforms and partnerships, but industry leaders say it offers ?immense potential? for not for profits.
Impact-led films, and the campaigns that go along with them, are increasingly being used as a tool to create social change.
That Sugar Film created a movement to help Australians build their nutritional literacy; Gayby Baby was included in school curriculum reforms to better support LGBTIQ+ students and families; and Embrace stirred international debate on body image, leading to director Taryn Brumfitt taking out the 2023 Australian of the Year award for her work.
While the effectiveness of impact films to drive action is evident, it has caused the already under-resourced social sector to become more competitive, with not for profits now contending for the same funding sources, platforms and partnerships as filmmakers.
Mitzi Goldman, CEO of Documentary Australia ? a not for profit connecting documentary filmmakers with philanthropists and inspiring action on important social issues ? said for-purpose organisations should see impact films ?as a gift? to advancing their cause.
?I think the social sector is a really important beneficiary of these films. I'd love to see them becoming more strategic and learning how to work more closely with filmmakers,? Goldman told Pro Bono News.
?I stress the importance of the social sector and documentary sector working closely together hand-in-hand ? there's immense potential in that partnership ? and not to see impact producers and documentaries as a threat, but actually as a gift to the social sector.
?There's definitely a lot of benefit, a lot of mutual benefit, and if not for profits really understand that, I don't think that they'd be afraid. I think they'd be knocking on our doors to find documentary filmmakers to work with.?
While Goldman acknowledges that an overlap in the goals of impact films and not for profits can create ?anxiety about the same funders being targeted?, she argues any competition between the sectors is unnecessary and reflects a misunderstanding of the industry.
?It points to a lack of understanding and communication of what it is that an impact producer does. I don't think a filmmaker should ever be in competition with [social service] organisations. In fact, what they need to do is to partner,? continued Goldman.
?Filmmakers are not at the coalface of the issues, these service organisations that are working in communities to alleviate these issues are the experts in the field. They've been doing this work for many, many years, and they're often fighting for limited funds.
?Filmmakers themselves are struggling for funding too, but the film itself can be used as a fundraising tool for these organisations.˜
?What we're seeing is that, where philanthropy has always funded some really important work in the community across a whole range of different issues, often that work is invisible. What a documentary allows is for that work to be seen and shared and replicated, and then for others to get on board and sustain it. That?s the work of an impact producer.?
The ABC?s executive producer of impact and partnerships Teri Calder agrees that while resourcing is limited, the benefits far outweigh the challenges when it comes to the impact of filmmakers working with the social sector.
?There are scarce resources and everybody?s competing for small pots of money ? sometimes NGOs and documentaries might be competing for the same pot,? said Calder.
?However, when NGOs and filmmakers partner and collaborate, the benefits can be enormous. We're the national broadcaster so we have to be independent, but there are incredible opportunities to use our documentary content to inform, educate and in turn, create real-world positive impact.?
Calder uses the example of the ABC?s social experiment documentary series Old People's Home For 4 Year Olds, which follows the experience of older people in a retirement community together with toddlers to see if the interaction improves the lives of the elderly. The ABC partnered with not for profit Playgroup Australia for the show, including a call to action at the end of each episode.
Within five months of airing, Calder says Playgroup Australia's intergenerational playgroups had grown from 40, built over five years, to over 100 with waitlists, thanks to the topic being spotlighted to a national audience, and as a result, communities better understanding the positive impact of intergenerational playgroups on mental health.
?There's this amplification of a message, that many organisations may have been trying to communicate for a long time, through a piece of factual, high value, entertaining, informative, educative content, where the whole of Australia gets behind it,? said Calder.