Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
Opinion  |  Social AffairsCommunity

COVID-19, charities and misplaced stimulus


5 March 2020 at 8:26 am
David Crosbie
The news is all about coronavirus. But, what does this mean for charities, asks Community Council for Australia CEO David Crosbie.


David Crosbie | 5 March 2020 at 8:26 am


3 Comments


 Print
COVID-19, charities and misplaced stimulus
5 March 2020 at 8:26 am

The news is all about coronavirus. But, what does this mean for charities, asks Community Council for Australia CEO David Crosbie.

I think it is important to start any discussion about coronavirus with a little perspective.

Each year in Australia, influenza kills on average 3,500 people. The best predictor of who is susceptible is age – 3,000 of these deaths are people aged over 50. Death rates for influenza in Australia are below 0.2 per cent of people who contract the disease. Estimates suggest close to half a million people die each year from influenza worldwide. 

The last global pandemic – the H1N1 or swine flu – resulted in around 19,000 hospitalisations and 200 deaths in Australia. It is estimated that one in five people worldwide contracted swine flu and the death rate was 0.02 per cent (less in Australia). 

Coronavirus (properly known as COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2) has so far resulted in one death in Australia and less than 20 hospitalisations. Reports indicate COVID-19 is more deadly than influenza – early estimates suggest death rates from COVID-19 are close to 1 per cent. This may change over time as it is likely that many people with COVID-19 only experience mild symptoms not requiring any medical intervention and are therefore not counted in the statistics. Many experts believe it is now inevitable that COVID-19 will continue to increase in prevalence. Although many of us may eventually contract COVID-19, most of us will experience relatively minor symptoms. As with influenza, the most susceptible to COVID-19 are the elderly. 

These alarming statistics about influenza (a death rate higher than our road toll) are exactly the reason governments and health experts are so concerned about COVID-19. No-one wants a disease equivalent to influenza spreading widely in our communities, even if most of us will only experience mild symptoms. Clearly, preventative measures are warranted and the likely increase in the disease will place increased pressure on our health services, so we need our health system to be prepared as best it can. This does not mean everyone stocking up on toilet paper.

While health and wellbeing are important for all of us, in practice Australian charities are most likely to experience the effect of COVID-19 more in relation to its impact on our economy than our health. 

“If cuts are made to support a business stimulus package it is the poorest that are likely to face a reduction in government support.”

The cumulative impact of bushfires and COVID-19 means an already brittle economy is now facing the very real possibility of a recession – two quarters in a row with negative GDP growth. The loss of economic activity (tourism, international trade, etc.) will translate into a loss of government revenue at exactly the time when governments need to stimulate investment and job creation to maintain growth.

History suggests governments look to business incentives and tax cuts to drive increases in economic activity, while at the same time seeking to make as many cuts to their expenditure as possible. This approach would not be good news for charities.

In a more evidence-based world, governments might recognise the economic benefits of providing increased spending power to the poorest in our community, significantly raise Newstart, and boost the funding of charities. It should be noted here that charities are more likely to use increased funding to employ people, unlike business where government incentives may well be used to deliver increased dividends for company owners. 

If cuts are made to support a business stimulus package it is the poorest that are likely to face a reduction in government support, and it is charities that will likely face a reduction in the government funding available to support their programs and services.

Many charities are already doing it tough. In some cases, charities have been waiting over a year for promised government funding. Some areas of government funding have already become so competitive and uncertain that charities relying on government support no longer feel confident in offering ongoing employment contracts. Casualisation of the charity workforce is increasing. Charities trade in trust. The casualisation of staff can reduce the opportunities for organisations to develop strong ongoing relationships with their communities.

What governments have repeatedly failed to recognise or accept is that the charities sector is the biggest employer in the country with over 1.3 million people employed across the sector. Any boost in the activity of charities not only provides more employment, it also delivers real community benefit through increased community support and activity. 

Even within the government’s short-term stimulus frame of reference, there are many opportunities to provide leveraged community benefit as well as boosting employment and the economy. If a capital fund could be established to enable charities to upgrade their facilities, improve their work environments, or offer more dignified surroundings to their clients, the benefits to the economy and our communities would be far greater than a similar investment in business infrastructure. There is a huge unmet need in this area as most charities would sooner offer more services to their community than invest money into their capacity in areas like purpose-built facilities, a more efficient computer system, or safer work environments.

Some in government bemoan what they describe as the inefficiency of charities, but there is rarely any acknowledgement that their own government’s approach to charities often drives increased inefficiency. If you reduce funding in real terms to charities while expecting them to provide the same level of programs and services, the inevitable outcome will be that charities have to cannibalise their organisational infrastructure in order to stay viable and continue to offer services to their communities. Achieving increased organisational efficiency invariably requires some up-front investment in infrastructure and capacity. Where is the investment coming from to support a more efficient charitable sector?

Governments often see the work of charities as discretionary, an area where cuts can be made without significant harm. Support for stimulating business activity on the other hand is seen as a high priority.

We can all look forward to the day when governments think beyond the politics of a short-term crisis, beyond the desires of business to be more profitable, and genuinely focus on broader economic and community investment opportunities. Ensuring adequate social safety nets and enabling charities to be more effective in their work are good starting points.

The real impact of COVID-19 and bushfires is likely to mean more charities go out of business, not because that makes sense for our economy, not because it makes sense for our communities, but because the government myopia prevents them from seeing the huge potential for genuine economic and social stimulus through the charities sector. 

How good would it be if COVID-19 helped remove blind spots?

About the author: David Crosbie is CEO of the Community Council for Australia. He has spent more than 20 years as CEO of significant charities including five years in his current role, four years as CEO of the Mental Health Council of Australia, seven years as CEO of the Alcohol and other Drugs Council of Australia, and seven years as CEO of Odyssey House Victoria.

David Crosbie writes exclusively for Pro Bono News on a fortnightly basis, covering issues of importance to the broader not-for-profit sector.


David Crosbie  |  @DavidCrosbie2

David Crosbie is the CEO of the Community Council for Australia (CCA).

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Advertisement

Virtual Congress - CPA Australia

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

3 comments

  • Avatar Michelle O'Flynn says:

    Sent yesterday to: Mr. Martin Hoffman NDIA CEO ; Hon Anne Ruston, Minister for Families and Social Services ; Hon Stuart Robert, Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme ; Hon Michelle Landry Assistant Minister Children and Families ; Hon Luke Howarth, ; David Moody, CEO NDS ; Ian Montague, State Manager NDS Qld ; Natalie Siegel-Brown, Public Guardian,
    Dear Eminent and Very Important People,

    I am writing to you with concerns for people with disability living in congregate care arrangements in light of the potential for transmission of COVID-19 “Coronavirus”.
    There appears to be a lack of concerted and cohesive policy for ensuring the health and safety and well-being of vulnerable people with disability who have heightened risk of contracting this disease due to the nature of their living conditions.
    I note that the website for National Disability Services has information about protection of health and wellbeing of staff but no statement about ensuring protection for the health and wellbeing of the people for whom they provide supports and services. In fact the website also notes the following: “At this stage there is no formal advice from the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) for providers relating to the coronavirus. We will monitor and when it becomes available, include this advice here.”
    I am deeply concerned that as ever, vulnerable people with disability are low on the agenda for government. Even the recent announcements for targeted economic stimulus puts business ahead of the needs of people with disability.
    Our organisation is an independent community-based systems and individual advocacy organisation and a community legal service for people with disability. Our mission is to promote, protect and defend, through systems and individual advocacy, the fundamental needs and rights and lives of the most vulnerable people with disability in Queensland.
    QAI’s constitution holds that every person is unique and valuable and that diversity is intrinsic to community. As a Disabled Persons’ Organisation, people with disability comprise the majority of our board and their lived experience of disability is our foundation and guide.
    We request that urgent explicit directives and actions are publicly made to promote and protect the health and well-being of people with disability with particular regard to those who are supported by direct support providers. It is imperative that this is undertaken imminently for people living in congregate care arrangements where workers may come and go, and in some circumstances, where the premises may have multiple purposes. An example of this is a group home that was utilising a spare room as an informal respite service on an ad hoc basis.
    Further to this we seek your urgent advice as to what procedures might be instigated if a number of people in shared care/living arrangements should become ill. Will they be sent to hospital? What measure will be implemented if people are confined to their homes? What protections will be implemented that do not in any way inhibit their rights to conduct their lives as other citizens in similar circumstances?
    I look forward to your individual responses, so that I may convey them to other advocacy organisations across Queensland.

    Yours sincerely,

    Michelle O’Flynn

    DIRECTOR | Queensland Advocacy Incorporated

  • Avatar Catherine Brown says:

    Excellent reflection on the essential role of charities as employers and as providers of community infrastructure as well as important services. Very interesting suggestion that this is in fact a time to strengthen the charitable sector through investment leading to win win outcomes.

  • Avatar Ewan D Filmer says:

    “What governments have repeatedly failed to recognise or accept is that the charities sector is the biggest employer in the country with over 1.3 million people employed across the sector.”
    This figure is bandied about without any reference as to how it can be verified. Health Care and Social Assistance is the largest industry in Australia according to the census, (Labour force, detailed, quarterly, Nov 2017, cat. no. 6291.0.55.003) however, there are a total of 3 sub levels below this division.

    The Health Care and Social Assistance area of the labour force of course includes many other participants in the workforce than those employed by charities. What exactly does Mr Crosbie mean by charities? Is he boosting the numbers of charity sector employees by including A N Z S I C (Q) classifications such as hospitals (including psychiatric hospitals), general practice and specialist medical services, dental services, pathology and diagnostic imaging services, allied health services etc? All of these are covered by the Health Care and Social Assistance industry. What is the real total?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Disappointing budgets, casualised employment and take me to your board

Contributor

Monday, 26th October 2020 at 6:04 pm

Vulnerable Aussies suffering from digital inequality

Luke Michael

Monday, 26th October 2020 at 6:00 pm

Help available when life takes an unexpected turn

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 14th October 2020 at 4:35 pm

Anti-Poverty Week, Paying to Work, and the Cost of Living in the NT

Contributor

Monday, 12th October 2020 at 5:54 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×