Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  | 

Pro Bono Work - Duty or Obligation?


5 March 2001 at 12:03 pm
Staff Reporter
University of NSW Law Students who took part in the Practicing in the Public Interest Course last year were required to produce a research essay for critical analysis.

Staff Reporter | 5 March 2001 at 12:03 pm


0 Comments


 Print
Pro Bono Work - Duty or Obligation?
5 March 2001 at 12:03 pm

University of NSW Law Students who took part in the Practicing in the Public Interest Course last year were required to produce a research essay for critical analysis. Fourth year student Deborah Potter’s essay titled “Should pro bono be a compulsory component of private law practice?” was chosen as best article.

Potter argues that a distinction needs to be made between acknowledging the ethical responsibility of lawyers to perform pro bono work and asserting that the fulfillment of the responsibility be made mandatory.

She says lawyers are in unique position to protect the defenceless, and lawyers have a duty to the law. Given the wider benefits to the community that would result from improving access to the legal system, it can be argued that the burden placed on lawyers is easily justified.

Potter goes on to argue that there are concerns that a compulsory pro bono scheme would require lawyers to perform work in areas where they are not experienced or qualified in.

She says that in a system where pro bono service is mandatory, the risk of inexperienced litigator being required to accept, or even simply feeling pressured to take on cases which they cannot cope with, would inevitably be increased.

As well she argues that the introduction of compulsory pro bono for private practitioners would reduce the expectation for the state to provide adequate levels of legal aid.

She says it would create a structure which would enable, and a culture which would allow the gradual reduction of government funding to legal aid. In the event of its introduction, the legal profession would need to be continually alert to this danger.

Potter, in conclusion, cautions against an across-the-board mandatory scheme, citing market realities, inappropriate experience, resource capacity and quality standards as factors requiring careful consideration.

Deborah Potter’s essay was supplied to Pro Bono Australia by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) and a complete copy can be obtained via e-mail to mailto:mmanaena@piac.asn.au.



PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Tags : Legal,

 Print

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Let’s talk about charity cyber security

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 30th September 2020 at 9:33 pm

Crowdfunding for the long term

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 30th September 2020 at 6:50 pm

The Aotearoa COVID-19 experience

Contributor

Wednesday, 30th September 2020 at 6:38 pm

What are you grateful for?

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 30th September 2020 at 6:26 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×