Guide to Giving
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  | 

Measuring Board Effectiveness – New Research


Monday, 9th October 2006 at 1:10 pm
Staff Reporter
A ‘checklist’ approach to meeting minimum responsibilities of a NFP board is no longer sufficient to help organisations deal with growing needs, challenges, and regulations confronting the sector according to new US Research.

Monday, 9th October 2006
at 1:10 pm
Staff Reporter


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Measuring Board Effectiveness – New Research
Monday, 9th October 2006 at 1:10 pm

A ‘checklist’ approach to meeting minimum responsibilities of a Not for Profit board is no longer sufficient to help organisations deal with growing needs, challenges, and regulations confronting the sector according to new US Research.

Not for Profit board members were once thought to be effective if they donated funds or services, or persuaded others to donate, at a certain level to the organization.

According to research conducted by the Bridgespan Group in collaboration with the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, fundraising is still important but it is not enough in the current climate.

The research says many boards take a “checklist” approach to ensure they are meeting their minimum responsibilities such as oversight of the executive director, financial health and controls and legal activities such as independent audits.

But oversight alone is not sufficient to create an effective board according to David Simms, Managing Director, Bridgestar.

Instead, he says, the Bridgespan team found that how the board does its work is as important as what it does.

By evaluating the five critical factors – people, culture, decision-making processes, information flows, and structures – organisations can bring clarity to what they need from their boards, and what each board member can provide, based on his or her skills and interests.

Bridgestar says that the solution for how to become a more effective board will generally be different for each organisation because each of those factors varies widely from one organization to the next. But addressing those five factors will help answer questions about how to choose the ‘right’ approaches for each organization.”

Insights from the research appear in the September issue of “Leadership Matters,” available at: www.bridgestar.org.

Subscriptions are available as part of free membership in Bridgestar. For a complimentary subscription, please email subscribe@bridgestar.org.



AON

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....

Moores

HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

...


More Suppliers

Tags : Governance,

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Indigenous Australians Face Lack of Access to Cataract Surgery

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 4:22 pm

NDIS Pricing – New Research Confirms Risks to Service Users

David Gilchrist

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:42 am

Future Uncertain for Disability Organisations Following Funding Cuts

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:29 am

POPULAR

New Study Warns NFPs Need Strong Culture and Profits to Survive

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 5th September 2017 at 12:02 pm

Moves to Stop Volunteering at Overseas Orphanages

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 1:54 pm

Peak Body Demands Action to Stop NDIS Leaving Aboriginal People Behind

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 5th September 2017 at 8:37 am

Future Uncertain for Disability Organisations Following Funding Cuts

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:29 am

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Guide to Giving
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

The social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!