GTG
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
NEWS  | 

Measuring Board Effectiveness – New Research


Monday, 9th October 2006 at 1:10 pm
Staff Reporter
A ‘checklist’ approach to meeting minimum responsibilities of a NFP board is no longer sufficient to help organisations deal with growing needs, challenges, and regulations confronting the sector according to new US Research.

Monday, 9th October 2006
at 1:10 pm
Staff Reporter


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Measuring Board Effectiveness – New Research
Monday, 9th October 2006 at 1:10 pm

A ‘checklist’ approach to meeting minimum responsibilities of a Not for Profit board is no longer sufficient to help organisations deal with growing needs, challenges, and regulations confronting the sector according to new US Research.

Not for Profit board members were once thought to be effective if they donated funds or services, or persuaded others to donate, at a certain level to the organization.

According to research conducted by the Bridgespan Group in collaboration with the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, fundraising is still important but it is not enough in the current climate.

The research says many boards take a “checklist” approach to ensure they are meeting their minimum responsibilities such as oversight of the executive director, financial health and controls and legal activities such as independent audits.

But oversight alone is not sufficient to create an effective board according to David Simms, Managing Director, Bridgestar.

Instead, he says, the Bridgespan team found that how the board does its work is as important as what it does.

By evaluating the five critical factors – people, culture, decision-making processes, information flows, and structures – organisations can bring clarity to what they need from their boards, and what each board member can provide, based on his or her skills and interests.

Bridgestar says that the solution for how to become a more effective board will generally be different for each organisation because each of those factors varies widely from one organization to the next. But addressing those five factors will help answer questions about how to choose the ‘right’ approaches for each organization.”

Insights from the research appear in the September issue of “Leadership Matters,” available at: www.bridgestar.org.

Subscriptions are available as part of free membership in Bridgestar. For a complimentary subscription, please email subscribe@bridgestar.org.




Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Tags : Governance,

 Print

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

How Can Cooperatives in the Platform Economy Shape the Future of Work?

Contributor

Tuesday, 6th March 2018 at 5:21 pm

ACNC Issues Direction to RSL National

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 20th February 2018 at 4:59 pm

Governance for Deductible Gift Recipients

Contributor

Tuesday, 12th December 2017 at 8:25 am

Annual Report Reveals ACNC Taking Proactive Approach to Compliance

Wendy Williams

Monday, 30th October 2017 at 5:16 pm

POPULAR

Concerns Raised Over NDIS Barriers for Homeless People With Disability

Maggie Coggan

Tuesday, 7th August 2018 at 8:24 am

NFPs Urged to Focus on Purpose

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th August 2018 at 8:27 am

Coordinated Care at Risk Under Marketisation of the NDIS

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th August 2018 at 8:20 am

Disability Advocates Welcome Pledge to Remove NDIA Staff Cap

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 8th August 2018 at 5:12 pm

GTG
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!