Civil Voices
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  | 

Corporate Philanthropy and Higher Profits?


Thursday, 25th January 2007 at 11:01 am
Staff Reporter
Research into corporate philanthropy and whether being charitable - such as donating money to medical research or to organisations that promote economic self-sufficiency - helps a company's financial picture concludes that it all depends on the type of industry.

Thursday, 25th January 2007
at 11:01 am
Staff Reporter


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Corporate Philanthropy and Higher Profits?
Thursday, 25th January 2007 at 11:01 am

Research into corporate philanthropy and whether being charitable — such as donating money to medical research or to organisations that promote economic self-sufficiency – helps a company’s financial picture concludes that it all depends on the type of industry.

The research is published by the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and is produced by Finance Professor Vinay B. Nair and two other researchers.

The researchers say corporate philanthropy and profits are positively related only in industries with high advertising intensity and high competition citing as examples the beverage and retail industries.

In low-advertising industries, such as computer chips and business-to-business services — the found that there is actually a negative association between philanthropy and profits.

The Wharton School says the mixed-bag findings come at a time when more and more companies are putting on a generous, good-citizen face.

Professor Nair says in the business community, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a significant theme.

His research paper is called "A Model for Corporate Philanthropy," co-authored with Columbia Business School Professors Raymond Fisman and Geoffrey Heal.

Nair and his colleagues theorise in the paper that charitable giving may be good for the bottom line because it helps to convince consumers that a company and its products are trustworthy. Trust factors into many purchases, particularly when it is not obvious why one product is better than another.

The researchers say visible corporate philanthropy provides a source of product differentiation in an otherwise uniform market space.

To gauge the relationship between corporate giving and profits, the researchers collected financial data from 1991 to 2003 on 3,000 companies.

Companies were assigned a philanthropy rating score based on certain levels and patterns of giving, such as support for housing or education initiatives. The researchers excluded from consideration good deeds that could also have the effect of boosting a company’s productivity and, in turn, its profits.

For instance, a company’s decision to operate an environmentally friendly plant could increase efficiency. Likewise, a company that offers flexi time and good maternity leave benefits may reap the benefits of a more loyal and productive workforce.

The researchers found, as they suspected, that there was much more philanthropy going on in advertising-intensive industries.

But when it came to profitability, being generous paid off — or at least didn’t cause a financial drag — only under certain circumstances.

The researchers concluded that in advertising-intensive industries, there is a more positive relationship between philanthropy and profit.

However they say that in an industry with very low advertising expenditures such as the steel industry, there is actually a negative association between philanthropy and profits.

From the perspective of competition, they found that for competitive industries, the direct cost of giving is offset by the benefits of differentiation that flow from corporate philanthropy.

They conclude that corporate philanthropy isn’t necessarily making those companies rich, but it isn’t hurting their bottom line, either.

Corporate philanthropy may act as a signalling device, indicating that a firm’s products are reliable and that it can be trusted to provide high quality in those dimensions where the consumer cannot readily check quality before buying," the paper concludes.

Read the full report at Knowledge@ Wharton http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/papers/1331.pdf?CFID=3686946&CFTOKEN=1010



FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

We specialise in data solutions consulting and IT profession...

DQUBE Solutions

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

Fantastic digital management app for organisations deliverin...

Ateesa

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Philanthropy is Energised by the Power of Advocacy

Krystian Seibert

Tuesday, 20th February 2018 at 8:48 am

US Thought Leaders Predict Philanthropy Trends for 2018

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 8th February 2018 at 8:30 am

Australian Philanthropists Urged to Conserve the Country’s Natural Wonders

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 16th January 2018 at 4:28 pm

Predictions for 2018: Philanthropy

Krystian Seibert

Tuesday, 9th January 2018 at 8:33 am

POPULAR

Luke Batty Foundation to Close as Rosie Batty Steps Down

Luke Michael

Monday, 19th February 2018 at 5:37 pm

Calls to Remove ‘Blanket Religious Exemptions’ for Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Friday, 16th February 2018 at 2:35 pm

Sharp Decline in People Accessing Disability Support Pension

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 21st February 2018 at 4:59 pm

Employee-Led Mutual to Deliver NDIS Services in SA

Luke Michael

Monday, 19th February 2018 at 10:54 am

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Civil Voices
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

The social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!