Close Search
News  |  General

Australia Ranked Second in 'Quality of Death'

21 July 2010 at 1:45 pm
Staff Reporter
Australia has ranked second after the UK in a 'Quality of Death' Index commissioned by the Lien Foundation in Singapore.

Staff Reporter | 21 July 2010 at 1:45 pm


Australia Ranked Second in 'Quality of Death'
21 July 2010 at 1:45 pm

It might be a taboo topic in many parts of the world but Australian has ranked second in an international 'Quality of Death' Index commissioned by Singapore's Lien Foundation.

According to the Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance, while more than 100 million patients and family care-givers worldwide need palliative care annually, less than 8% of this number actually receives it.

With this in mind, the Economist Intelligence Unit devised a "Quality of Death" Index to rank countries according to their provision of end-of-life or palliative care. The Index, commissioned by the Lien Foundation measures the current environment for end-of-life care services across 40 countries.

At the top of the table is the UK, which has led the way globally in terms of its hospice care network and statutory involvement in end-of-life care. The UK's top rank comes despite the country having a far-from-perfect healthcare system. New Zealand ranked third.

Researchers say the US came in at number 9 in the overall ranking principally because of the financial burden of end-of-life care. This reflects the high overall cost of healthcare in the US, where expenditure has risen sharply in recent years, now accounting for one dollar in every six spent.

The research says it is no surprise to find countries such as the UK, Australia and New Zealand high in the overall ranking, given their relative wealth, advanced infrastructure and long recognition of the importance of developing national end-of-life healthcare strategies.

Many rich nations lag a long way behind in the overall score: these include Denmark (22nd), Italy (24th) and South Korea (32nd). In these cases the quality and availability of care is often poor and policy co-ordination lacking.

The bottom-ranked countries in the Quality of Death Index include developing and BRIC countries, such as China, Brazil, India and Uganda, where despite notable exceptions of excellence – such as the Indian state of Kerala, and services delivered through Hospice Africa Uganda – progress on providing end-of-life care is slow.

In the case of China and India, further problems are vast populations for whom end-of-life coverage extends to only a fraction of those in need.

The Economist Intelligence Unit has analysed the Index results in a white paper with the key findings as follows:

  • Combating perceptions of death, and cultural taboos, is crucial to improving palliative care. Death and dying are stigmatised in some cultures to the point where they are taboo – as in Chinese culture. In Western societies death has become medicalised and curative procedures are often prioritised ahead of palliative care. In the US, discussion of end-of-life care often inflames religious sentiment that holds the sanctity of life paramount. The issue is complicated by the perception that "hospice care" is often associated with "giving up".
  • Public debates about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide may raise awareness, but relate to only a small minority of deaths. While debates about these issues gain the most media attention, they affect only a tiny proportion of the terminally ill. (Consequently, policies on these issues are not included in the Index, although the legal status of "do not resuscitate" orders is included.) Nonetheless, pressure brought on policymakers over these issues can be a catalyst for the improvement of palliative care services – as in Australia, where the federal overturning of a Northern Territory euthanasia law in 1996 led to increased national funding for end-of-life care.
  • Drug availability is the most important practical issue. Pain control is the point from which all palliative care stems, and the availability of opioids (morphine and its equivalents) is fundamental to quality of end-of-life care. But across the world an estimated 5bn people lack access to opioids, principally due to concerns about illicit drug use and trafficking. A lack of training is also a problem, with many doctors and nurses ignorant of how to administer them.
  • State funding of end-of-life care is limited and often prioritises conventional treatment. In many countries – even where palliative care treatment is available through national healthcare systems or insurance – end-of-life care bodies rely on charitable donations and philanthropic activity to support them. In the US, while palliative care is available through public medical insurance, patients must relinquish curative treatments to be eligible for reimbursements (unlike in the UK, for example).
  • More palliative care may mean less health spending. By increasing the proportion of community and homecare, palliative care can reduce costs associated with hospital stays and emergency admissions. In the US in particular, with the recent passing of a major healthcare reform bill, this is likely to become a focus of debate. In Spain, one study found that in 2006 a shift away from the use of conventional hospital treatment towards palliative care, an increase in homecare and lower use of emergency rooms, generated savings of 61% compared with expenditure recorded in a 1992 study. However, the costs associated with non-cancer palliative care are higher than for cancer-related care. And as the population ages, more end-of-life care will be needed overall.

The Quality of Death Index measures the current environment for end-of life care services across 40 countries: 30 OECD nations and 10 select others for which data was available. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s research team interviewed a variety of doctors, specialists and other experts to compile and verify the data.

The Index scores countries across four categories: Basic End-of-Life Healthcare Environment; Availability of End-of-Life Care; Cost of End-of-Life Care; and Quality of End-of-Life Care.

The Economist Intelligence Unit is the business information arm of The Economist Group, publisher of The Economist.

The Lien Foundation is a Singapore philanthropic house noted for its model of radical philanthropy.

The full white paper and index can be downloaded free of charge at:

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at or download our contributor guidelines.
Most Viewed



Get more stories like this


Your email address will not be published.


A tale of two polls: So what is the real difference?

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 12th November 2020 at 8:37 am

Meet Pro Bono News’ first editorial advisory board

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 16th April 2020 at 8:02 am

Unpaid Carers Facing Significant Economic Disadvantage

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 21st August 2018 at 3:45 pm

NFPs Driving WA Economy, Report Says

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 15th February 2017 at 4:20 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook