Guide to Giving
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

And the Winner is…the Not for Profit Sector


Thursday, 9th September 2010 at 6:01 pm
Staff Reporter
Opinion | If we trust the pre-election commitments of Labor and the Greens, the election of the new government is a major win for the Not for Profit sector, says Pro Bono Australia co-publisher David James, in this assessment of the election results.

Thursday, 9th September 2010
at 6:01 pm
Staff Reporter


2 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
And the Winner is…the Not for Profit Sector
Thursday, 9th September 2010 at 6:01 pm

David James, Pro Bono Australia

If we trust the pre-election commitments of Labor and the Greens, the election of the new government is a major win for the Not for Profit sector, says Pro Bono Australia co-publisher David James, in this assessment of the election results.

In their protracted speeches before the assembled media both Tony Windsor or Rob Oakshott gave many reasons justifying their decision to support Julia Gillard’s Government. Regional assistance, broadband, health and education – along with stability – all got a good airing.

At no point did the interests of the independents mention the Not for Profit sector. Nor, we can be sure, did the sector’s interests become a point of negotiation during the 17 days of a hung parliament. It goes without saying that there would have been no consideration of the Productivity Commission’s report, The Contribution of the Not for Profit Sector, and its suite of recommendations.

Hardly a surprise. In the big scheme of things, the recommendations of a Productivity Commission report on the Not for Profit sector would never warrant attention, not when the formation of a government is at stake.

And yet, despite its seeming invisibility, the decision of two of the three amigos to support the Gillard/Brown coalition represents a major win for the Not for Profit sector.

The lead-up

How this happened has a lot to do with you, our readers. In the first week of the election campaign Pro Bono Australia, in cooperation with the Centre for Social Impact, conducted a survey of readers opinions on the major recommendations made by the Productivity Commission. We did not expect much of a response. It is dry stuff, technical, but we hoped, given its significance, we might get 400 responses. We were wrong. Fully 1,520 people completed the survey. Around 320 of those added rich comments.

Numbers make a difference. We found we were readily able to engage the attention of the parties to the issues raised in the survey, because the response has been so high, in so short a timeframe.

We published the survey findings in the form of a Manifesto: Towards a Thriving Not for Profit Sector. We asked Labor, the Coalition and the Greens for a pre-election response. We made numerous phone calls, to the offices of Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries (actual and shadow), and to people connected with the parties.

The result was gratifying. Two weeks later, the Labor Party convened a special Press Conference, detailing a response to the Productivity Commission recommendations. Importantly, the Press Conference was conducted by fully three Government members: Jenny Macklin, the Minister for Community Services, Nick Sherry, the Assistant Treasurer, and Ursula Stephens, the Parliamentary Secretary for Social Inclusion.

Later that same week, the Greens reponded, directly to Pro Bono Australia and through a general press release, stating their support for the Labor Party’s response.

The Coalition decided not to respond. This was a deliberate decision. We understand that the campaign head honchos wanted to stay strictly ‘on message’; they judged that making commitments on relatively minor matters, like our Manifesto, would be a distraction. While this was disappointing, this does not necessarily mean or even imply that the Liberal Party disagree with the Manifesto. The possibility for bi-partisan support remains real.

What did the NFP sector win?

Overall, the Labor Party and the Greens gave broad support for the Productivity Commission report and its suite of recommendations. Within that, the Labor Party specifically made a commitment to:

  • A new Office for the Not for Profit Sector, located within the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, to drive and coordinate the policy reform agenda supported by a new Not for Profit sector Reform Council made up of representatives from across the sector.
  • Immediate commencement of a scoping study to determine the role and design options for a national ‘one-stop-shop’ regulator for the non-profit sector to remove the complex regulatory arrangements currently in place and streamline reporting arrangements. The scoping study will be finalised early in 2011 and will guide the reform program.
  • Reducing red-tape for government-funded NFP organisations by developing a common form contract or ‘master agreement’ and reviewing tendering, contracting and acquittal arrangements between the Australian Government and NFP organisations to streamline and reduce compliance burden commensurate with risk.

The Labor Party also committed to working towards greater harmonisation and simplification between the Australian and State and Territory governments on NFP sector issues, including regulation.

For their part, the Greens, thought Senator Rachel Siewert, Spokesperson on Community Services, welcomed the Labor Party’s commitments, and undertook to closely monitor these reform commitments to ensure they are delivered.

And Now….

At the time of writing, the new Ministry has not been formed. So we do not know who will be responsible for implementing these commitments.

However, whoever it is, we very much hope that the process adopted will be reflective of the ‘new paradigm’ that has emerged in Canberra: of openness and consultation, driven by a strong sense of urgency to get things done.

For now, Pro Bono Australia, and its partner in the Manifesto, the Centre for Social Impact, expresses its thanks, once again, to each person who participated in the survey, which proved so instrumental in securing the pre-election commitments. We await further developments. 

Click here to view the Manifesto



Guide to Giving

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....

Moores

Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Public Interest / Private Interest – A Fundamental Distinction

David Crosbie

Thursday, 14th September 2017 at 8:46 am

Boosting Philanthropy For A Stronger Australia

Wendy Williams

Monday, 11th September 2017 at 5:16 pm

Students With a Disability Face Cuts in Five States and Territories Next Year

Luke Michael

Friday, 8th September 2017 at 10:08 am

POPULAR

Moves to Stop Volunteering at Overseas Orphanages

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 1:54 pm

Future Uncertain for Disability Organisations Following Funding Cuts

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:29 am

Majority of NFPs Are Not Believed to be Well-Run, According to New Survey

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 12th September 2017 at 4:14 pm

More Australians Are Giving Time Not Money

Wendy Williams

Monday, 11th September 2017 at 5:07 pm

2 Comments

  • Melanie Oppenheimer Melanie Oppenheimer says:

    I agree with everything written here. However since the announcement of the new Gillard ministry I have been searching for any reference at all to the Not For Profit [voluntary; non profit – call it what you will] and volunteering in the line up. It appears that we no longer have a Parliamentary Secretary overseeing the Voluntary Sector specifically – and I cannot really see who is now responsible – the new Minister for Social Inclusion? Or the PM herself or ????

    What happens to volunteering? There are a number of ministeries that could absorb it but this could prove its continued neglect.

    Have we been sold a lemon?

    • Meiko Meiko says:

      @Melanie

      Social Inclusion has been promoted to a ministerial portfolio. Perhaps, given that this has been bundled with Human Services, it could be assumed that the third sector is sitting under this ministry. The offices in Prime Minister and Cabinet haven’t been reported as far as I know, and I assume that there will be an office for the third sector situated in there, given the statements pre-election.

      If you haven’t read it already, this Pro Bono article outlines the new ministerial departments:
      https://probonoaustralia.com.au/news/2010/09/new-ministerial-line-significant-nfps

      Aside from the ones outlined in the linked article, the sector could also expect to deal with Kate Ellis (Childcare), Mark Butler (Mental Health and Ageing), Tony Burke (Communities, Environment) and Simon Crean (Arts, Local Government, Regional Development).

      With the publishing of ABS’s Draft Information Development Plan and the Senate Economic Legislation Committee’s call for greater transparency, I think we could expect some further news from government on the sector soon.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Guide to Giving
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!