Guide to Giving
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  | 

ACNC Reveals Charity Fraud


Tuesday, 28th January 2014 at 11:57 am
Staff Reporter, Journalist
The charity regulator, the ACNC, has investigated complaints against more than 200 Australian charities in its first year of operation, including one charity whose husband and wife directors have since fled the country.

Tuesday, 28th January 2014
at 11:57 am
Staff Reporter, Journalist


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
ACNC Reveals Charity Fraud
Tuesday, 28th January 2014 at 11:57 am

The charity regulator, the ACNC, has investigated complaints against more than 200 Australian charities in its first year of operation, including one charity whose husband and wife directors have since fled the country.

In the ACNC’s first year, the regulator says the Compliance team received and assessed 202 charity related concerns – an average of 17 charity related complaints per month.

The regulator says eight of these involved investigations of serious matters of fraud and governance.

In particular, one of the most serious investigations involved an (so far) unnamed charity around allegations of serious mismanagement and fraud against a husband and wife who were directors on the charity’s board.

“The couple took over the charity, initially with the support of the members and existing board; however many members cancelled their membership following the couple's increasing abuse of their position within the charity,” the ACNC review revealed.

“The complainant alleged that the couple illegally changed the charity’s constitution, redirected funds for their own personal gain, and initiated the sale of the charity’s assets, without the knowledge or the authority of its members. They also transferred large amounts of cash from the charity’s bank accounts to personal accounts offshore.

“The ACNC’s investigation into this charity suggests serious problems with the charity’s governance, including failure to invite members to meetings, failure to hold discussions or votes regarding changes to the charity’s constitution and selling the charity’s assets. It also found that records of meetings were incomplete or inaccurate.

“The charity is no longer operating on a day to day basis and the individuals who are the subject of the complaint have left Australia; they have no intention of returning,” the review said.

“The ACNC is liaising with the relevant authorities overseas, as well as working to ensure control of the charity is returned to its members and the assets protected.”

The majority of concerns raised about charities in the ACNC Review fit three main risk types. These are: governance (50), fraudulent or criminal activity (48), and private benefit (21).

The ACNC said that it had a softly softly regulatory approach. The report does not name the charities involved or the states in which they operate and has not revealed if any criminal charges have been laid as a result of its investigations.

“We work with charities to help them correct their mistakes, using the least intrusive powers possible to do so,” the review said.

“We take our regulatory function seriously. When wrongdoing occurs, it is often not just a financial loss that damages the charity. The impact on its reputation and the effects on staff, volunteers, beneficiaries and board members are also damaging. This is why we handle compliance sensitively and in line with our regulatory approach.”

The review revealed a second serious fraud investigation concerning a senior member of staff was using the charity’s credit card to make private purchases, unrelated to the work of the charity.

The ACNC said contacted the charity’s board about the allegations, and commenced working with the charity as part of its investigation.

“As an initial step, the board removed the individual alleged to have made the purchases, the purchases were admitted and the individual repaid some of the debts.

“However, the ACNC investigation found that the theft of funds was more extensive and significant than initially identified.

“The charity worked with the ACNC throughout the investigation, committed to dealing with the matter and continuing their charitable endeavours. With the support of the ACNC, they worked through the issues of governance that had allowed the theft to occur, and sought to implement changes to address the identified vulnerabilities.

“At the ACNC’s behest the charity filed a report to the police so that the alleged fraud could be investigated by the appropriate authority,” the review said.

The ACNC’s first annual review said the majority of concerns raised about charities were governance (50), fraudulent or criminal activity (48), and private benefit (21).

The majority of the concerns (131) were raised by the public, 40 were referred by other government agencies and the remainder (31) came from other sources and active intelligence.

 


Staff Reporter  |  Journalist |  @ProBonoNews


Guide to Giving

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....

Moores

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

More Suppliers


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Thinkers Look to Melbourne to Grow SA Purpose Economy

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 21st September 2017 at 4:44 pm

$2 Million Grant Helps Give Australians in Need A Fair Go

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 21st September 2017 at 8:35 am

NFPs Need Social Media More Than They Know

Alecia Hancock

Thursday, 21st September 2017 at 8:33 am

POPULAR

Moves to Stop Volunteering at Overseas Orphanages

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 1:54 pm

Future Uncertain for Disability Organisations Following Funding Cuts

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:29 am

Majority of NFPs Are Not Believed to be Well-Run, According to New Survey

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 12th September 2017 at 4:14 pm

More Australians Are Giving Time Not Money

Wendy Williams

Monday, 11th September 2017 at 5:07 pm

One Comment

  • corinna corinna says:

    Why protect them without placing their names on this article. These people are scums and will they get away with it. They should be named and shamed so that they don't do it again otherwise how can others be aware. Instead the law will publicly shame the youth who do minor stuff like graffiti. Ridiculous!

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Guide to Giving
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!