subscribe to careers
News  |  Policy

Community Leaders Reject Changes to Race Hate Laws

Thursday, 20th March 2014 at 10:07 am
Staff Reporter
Not for Profits and ethnic community representatives have expressed their “vehement opposition” to proposed changes to sections of the Racial Discrimination Act by the Federal Government.

Thursday, 20th March 2014
at 10:07 am
Staff Reporter



Community Leaders Reject Changes to Race Hate Laws
Thursday, 20th March 2014 at 10:07 am

Not for Profits and ethnic community representatives have expressed their “vehement opposition” to proposed changes to sections of the Racial Discrimination Act by the Federal Government.

The proposed changes, as part of an election commitment, are to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibit public conduct that is reasonably likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” a person or groups because of their skin colour or national or ethnic origin.

The ethnic group representing Indigenous, Greek, Jewish, Chinese, Arab, Armenian and Korean communities said the proposed changes remove the words “offend, insult, humiliate” from section 18C, as well as removing the requirement that a defendant must have acted “reasonably and in good faith” in order to be covered by the free speech defences available under section 18D.

“These changes would mean that the Federal Government has decided to license the public humiliation of people because of their race,” a spokesperson for the group said.

“It would send a signal that people may spout racist abuse in public, no matter how unreasonably and dishonestly. It would be astonishing if an Australian government in the 21st century was prepared to embrace such a morally repugnant position. It would be utterly indefensible.”

The group, which has been pursuing a vigorous campaign to dissuade Federal politicians against any repeal or watering down of Australia’s laws against racial vilification since November 2013, has vowed to step up its activities.

“The Racial Discrimination Act is one of Australia’s most iconic pieces of legislation. It goes to the heart of Australia’s identity as a nation that is both democratic and culturally diverse. The law ought not to be changed unless there are truly compelling reasons. The outcome of one contentious case falls a long way short in that regard,” the spokesperson said.

“The existing sections 18C and 18D were enacted in 1995 after three national inquiries in Australia found that there is a nexus between racially vilifying conduct in public and racially-motivated violence. The two sections strike a careful balance between freedom from racial vilification and freedom of expression.”

Anti-discrimination Not for Profit, All Together Now, which produces public education initiatives to promote the prevention of racism in Australia said the Attorney General had turned a blind eye to the immense damage and harm caused by racial vilification by proposing to remove protections from the Racial Discrimination Act.

“The way to end racism in Australia is for leaders to acknowledge that racism exists and demonstrate that racism will not be tolerated. Yet the government’s current proposal will do the opposite,” Priscilla Brice, Managing Director of All Together Now, said.

“All Together Now is concerned that the proposal will make racism socially acceptable. Under the guise of ‘free speech’ the only recourse for a target of racial abuse will be to confront the perpetrator because they will no longer have legal protections.

“These legal protections currently enable people to make a complaint via the Australian Human Rights Commission. This is particularly important for people who find themselves in instances where they feel intimidated or it is simply dangerous to speak up because the perpetrator is becoming violent.

“On Monday, researchers from the ongoing Challenging Racism project announced new research findings that nearly 80 per cent of Australians support the current laws against racial vilification,” she said.

“All Together Now remains extremely concerned that the government is considering changes that will put perpetrators in a stronger position, which can be exploited.”

The groups say they have not seen any proposed legislation but expect the Government to introduce a Bill in Parliament soon.

Staff Reporter  |  Journalist  |  @ProBonoNews

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Racism in the media

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 12th November 2019 at 8:22 am

Australia’s social progress ranking hurt by poor environmental performance

Luke Michael

Monday, 23rd September 2019 at 3:53 pm

Why NFPs Should Volunteer to File a Modern Slavery Statement

Rob Jackson

Thursday, 26th July 2018 at 1:59 pm

Why Investing in an Awards Event Brings Results

Paul Carter

Wednesday, 25th July 2018 at 1:59 pm


How are Aussie charities helping in the bushfire crisis?

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th January 2020 at 3:21 pm

What impact will the bushfire crisis have on homelessness?

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:28 pm

The rise (and scepticism) of Facebook fundraisers

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 8:49 am

Bushfire resources for people with disability


Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:54 pm

subscribe to careers
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!