MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

Hockey Defends ‘Remedial’ Budget to Not for Profits


Wednesday, 21st May 2014 at 4:53 pm
Staff Reporter,
Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey has been forced to defend his Federal Budget to the Not for Profit sector, saying that while the Coalition’s Budget may seem tough, society’s most vulnerable will end up paying unless “remedial action” is undertaken.

Wednesday, 21st May 2014
at 4:53 pm
Staff Reporter,


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Hockey Defends ‘Remedial’ Budget to Not for Profits
Wednesday, 21st May 2014 at 4:53 pm

Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey has been forced to defend his Federal Budget to the Not for Profit sector, saying that while the Coalition’s Budget may seem tough, society’s most vulnerable will end up paying unless “remedial action” is undertaken.

Speaking in Sydney at a post-budget lunch organised by the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) and attended by more than 200 sector leaders, Treasurer Hockey said: “If we don’t start to live within our means sooner or later the people most vulnerable in the community are going to be the ones most affected.

“This budget is not about being popular. Nor is it about making people happy. It’s about doing what we believe must be done to lift the quality of life that people are going to have into the future.”

Hockey delivered his first budget – coined by ACOSS as an attempt to ‘divide the nation’ – last week amid strong criticism from the Not for Profit sector.

The Treasurer’s defence however came as ACOSS released new figures today that reveal that people on low and middle incomes will carry the overwhelming burden of repairing the Federal Budget.

“The burden of restoring the Budget will not be fairly shared,” ACOSS CEO Dr Cassandra Goldie said.

“Over the next four years, people and families living on low incomes will be expected to contribute over half the savings in the Budget (52 per cent), compared with  less than one sixth coming from people on high incomes.

“More than $19 billion out of $37 billion (52 per cent) in budget savings in key programs and services over the next four years will come from reductions in spending on programs that mainly assist low and middle income earners. Only $5.7 billion (15 per cent) are tax increases or savings in programs mainly benefiting people on high incomes."

At the ACOSS post-budget event yesterday the Treasurer said: “Unquestionably there has been an expansion of the welfare system over the years.

“But in extending what is deemed to be welfare, higher and higher up the pay scale and what it means is you can afford it while you’ve got money coming in but then when the money doesn’t come in how do you pare it back?

“What we’d really like to see is a strong, entirely sustainable safety net in Australia. And the balancing act is trying to reduce the spread of welfare but at the same time trying to ensure the welfare safety net is strong.”

 
Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey and ACOSS Chief Executive Dr Cassandra Goldie at the ACOSS Post-Budget lunch in Sydney. Photo: ACOSS

Dr Goldie said that while there were some elements of the budget the sector was pleased to see, they were obviously hoping to see some very different policies.

“Why have we now seen a budget – which we said at the time and we maintain this view – that seems to divide us… where we know that the level of poverty is most entrenched in the experience of young unemployed people, single mothers and children living in poverty and the biggest hit is on those lowest income families,” she questioned.  

“And we have not yet done anything in this budget to look at the assets test on the aged pension, we’ve got people who are able to own their own multi-million dollar home and still be able to claim a part pension.

“That’s what throws up to us why we don’t have a budget that’s delivered on targeting government funding where it’s needed the most.”

But the Treasurer denied that the government was seeking to divide the nation, saying the claim could not be further from the truth.

Among the key themes to emerge at the lunch were concerns around youth, single parents, families and unemployment.

The Treasurer appeared lost for words when pressed on questions around the cuts to the family tax benefits by National Council for Single Mothers and their Children chief executive Terese Edwards, the Treasurer stalled, unable to provide an answer.

“I implore you to hit the pause button, do not proceed; particularly in regards to slashing family tax benefits and I would really like to hear from you that you may reconsider,” Edwards said.  

Hockey attempted to reassure sector leaders that the Government was interested in ongoing conversation.

“It’s not the last word. It’s the first word,” he said. “And I am here to engage in constructive dialogue with ACOSS and others for our term in government.”



ING Direct

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


NGO Recruitment is a highly specialised provider of recruitm...

NGO Recruitment

We are a premium Event Production agency with over 16 years ...

Vanilla Bean Events

Established in 1998, StreetFleet is a 100% Australian owned ...

Streetfleet

Leading recruitment specialists in Sydney for 10 years for t...

BRC Recruitment

More Suppliers


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Youth Homelessness Prevention Funding Saved

Ellie Cooper

Wednesday, 22nd February 2017 at 3:04 pm

Feds Hold Key to NDIS Report as Issue Becomes Hot Topic for WA Election

Alison Blake

Friday, 17th February 2017 at 2:27 pm

Same-Sex Marriage Bill Strikes a Good Balance

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th February 2017 at 3:38 pm

‘Stark Reality’ as Australia Not On Track for Closing the Gap

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 14th February 2017 at 4:23 pm

POPULAR

New Initiative Helps NFPs Attract Impact Investment

Ellie Cooper

Tuesday, 21st February 2017 at 12:01 am

Cate Blanchett Voices ‘Game Changing’ NDIS Avatar

Wendy Williams

Monday, 20th February 2017 at 4:31 pm

The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations

Kelly Vincent

Monday, 20th February 2017 at 8:43 am

Social Innovation – the Last and Next Decade

Geoff Mulgan

Monday, 20th February 2017 at 1:09 pm

One Comment

  • Kate D Kate D says:

    So Joe says that he is keen to engage in an ongoing conversation but fails to provide answers? How exactly does that work? Of all the things in the budget that will affect my son and I it is the cut to FTB B that frightens me the most. There is no loop hole I can engage, no way around that one. We can walk, ride our bikes to avoid the overwhelming petrol costs although living in a country town we will still be hit hard. I am on DSP but do try to avoid the doctor anyway by studying, mind of matter and all that…. but take $50 out of my purse every single week of the year and I will struggle to keep the roof over our heads. HELP!

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Pro Bono News

Charity and not-for-profit news delivered directly to your inbox twice a week. Stay up to date with the latest news from the country’s most valuable sector.

You have Successfully Subscribed!