Good 360
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Leadership

“Bogus” Businessman Stripped of Charity Status


Thursday, 11th June 2015 at 11:31 am
Xavier Smerdon, Journalist
A charity linked to a man who has been banned from running businesses for 15 years and fined $450,000 has finally been shut down by the charity regulator, the ACNC.

Thursday, 11th June 2015
at 11:31 am
Xavier Smerdon, Journalist


3 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
“Bogus” Businessman Stripped of Charity Status
Thursday, 11th June 2015 at 11:31 am

A charity linked to a man who has been banned from running businesses for 15 years and fined $450,000 has finally been shut down by the charity regulator, the ACNC.

The Mature Age Group Charity Association has been stripped of its charity status after more than two years of investigations and court actions by Government consumers organisations.

The ACNC has deregistered the charity set up by Victorian man and Heartlink company director, Laurence Hann, who was banned in 2012 by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) for 15 years from managing a company in a landmark Federal Court judgement over an “egregious series” contraventions of competition and consumer law.

The ACCC said the 2012 judgement concerned “unscrupulous business practices which prey on disadvantaged or vulnerable consumers” in the promotion and sale of a parcel distribution business for 'Heartlink' branded household products, including the sale of goods for donation to charity.

Consumer Affairs Victoria also took court action over Hann’s activities, which it described as running a “bogus business opportunity which claimed to raise funds for charity”.

In 2009 Hann set up the charity known as the Mature Age Group Charity Association with a registered address in the small town of the Kalangadoo, near Mt Gambier in South Australia.

The owner of the property told Pro Bono Australia News she was asked to be the volunteer book keeper by the founder Laurie Hann who lived near Casterton in Victoria.

She said Hann and his wife made household cleaning products such as dishwashing liquid, oven cleaner and laundry detergent from their home and the profits from the sales were distributed to schools, aged care facilities and other charities.

She said the charity has had no money in its account for several of years and all those helping Laurie Hann were volunteers. She said she understood that Hann was in his 70s, was very sick and his wife was his carer.

ACCC chairman Rod Sims said the Federal Court decision in 2012 was the first time the ACCC had obtained orders from the Federal Court which disqualify an individual from managing companies.

In handing down the $450,000 civil pecuniary penalty against Hann, Federal Court Justice Richard Tracey said "I consider his conduct to constitute an egregious series of contraventions of legislation designed to protect consumers. He well knew what he was doing was wrong but he still persisted."

"There can be no doubt that Mr Hann's conduct was deliberate.

"The fact that they (his victims) had been cynically exploited did not deter Mr Hann from continuing his attempts to attract further investors who, I readily infer, would have been destined to lose their money."

Justice Tracey also imposed injunctions against Hann for 15 years which prevent him from carrying on a business or supplying goods or services in connection with which:

  • persons are invited to invest money or perform work

  • any claim is made that moneys or profits earned by the sale of goods are donated to charity, or

  • goods or services concerned are or include household cleaning products.

"The conduct has resulted in substantial losses being sustained by people, many of them elderly, across Australia,” Justice Tracey said.

“Hann has a long history of establishing companies and other entities and using them to promote dubious business opportunities in order to obtain funds. He should not have the opportunity to do so again.”

According the ACNC’s website the charity indicated that it was engaged in aged care and rehabilitation activities.

The ACNC said the charity status of the Mature Age Group Charity Association was revoked on 5 June 2015 under section 35-10 of the of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (ACNC Act) which points non compliance of governance standards or external conduct.

The charity was listed as having revenue of less than $250,000 and was operated by six volunteers.

The charity regulator has revoked eleven charities following compliance action since it was established in December 2012.  

Commissioner Susan Pascoe AM said the ACNC takes a proportional approach to compliance activity.

“The ACNC has a range of regulatory powers at its disposal,” Pascoe said.

“This includes guidance and support, warnings, directions and enforceable undertakings. Where appropriate the ACNC will revoke an organisation’s status as a registered charity.”

The ACNC said it was prevented by secrecy provisions in the ACNC Act from disclosing the details of any case. Under the ACNC Act, decisions to use formal powers must usually be published on the ACNC Charity Register.

When a decision to revoke is made, charities are informed and provided with the reasons for revocation via both phone and mail. The charities then have 60 days to lodge an objection to this decision.

For more information about the ACNC’s compliance activity, visit acnc.gov.au/compliancedecisions.


Xavier Smerdon  |  Journalist |  @XavierSmerdon

Xavier Smerdon is a journalist specialising in the Not for Profit sector. He writes breaking and investigative news articles.

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

...


More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Australians Want to Hear the Voices of Charities – Politicians Take Note

David Crosbie

Thursday, 23rd November 2017 at 8:48 am

Australian Trust in Charities Still High But Dropping: New ACNC Report

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 22nd November 2017 at 2:31 pm

Philanthropist Susan Alberti AC Named Melburnian of the Year

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 21st November 2017 at 9:17 am

Concerns Raised Over New ACNC Board Appointments

Luke Michael

Monday, 20th November 2017 at 2:28 pm

POPULAR

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

Concerns Raised Over New ACNC Board Appointments

Luke Michael

Monday, 20th November 2017 at 2:28 pm

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

Adelaide at the Vanguard of Ending Street Homelessness Globally

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 21st November 2017 at 8:43 am

3 Comments

  • Voltara Voltara says:

    “Hann has a long history of establishing companies and other entities and using them to promote dubious business opportunities in order to obtain funds. He should not have the opportunity to do so again.” A long history as the article itself reports, this individual has been stealing from people for decades. They have removed his tax-free status (which was of course never deserved in the first place) because that might cost them money. However he will be free to continue to steal from members of the public.

  • Matt b says:

    Can anyone please inform me of Laurrie Hann’s contact details / home address as he still owes me $15k from his fraugelent so called charity business ventures listed in this article, was Heartlink Enterprises / mature age group.
    If anyone has any details of his whereabouts etc. please email me matt.mtbker@gmail.com
    Any information on his whereabouts would be much appreciated as I’m very keen to catch up with him to discuss this dept.

  • Marlene M says:

    We also invested in Heartlink we paid about $15K I will have to go through the paper work which I found today while cleaning out draws in the office, and decided to look into google to see if there was any information out there. I would like to know if the fine of $450,000 is to be distributed to all the investors, if so I would like some information as to how to go about this.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Good 360
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

The social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!