NDIS Criterion
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

Feds Enviro Group Crackdown “Reckless”


Wednesday, 19th August 2015 at 1:03 pm
Lina Caneva, Editor
The Abbott Government’s move to change environmental law to stop “third party” court appeals by environmental groups has been described as reckless and an unjustified overreaction by advocacy groups and independent think tank The Australia Institute.

Wednesday, 19th August 2015
at 1:03 pm
Lina Caneva, Editor


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Feds Enviro Group Crackdown “Reckless”
Wednesday, 19th August 2015 at 1:03 pm

The Abbott Government’s move to change environmental law to stop “third party” court appeals by environmental groups has been described as reckless and an unjustified overreaction by advocacy groups and independent think tank The Australia Institute.

The Abbott Government plans to stop environment groups from challenging large developments following the controversial court decision that stopped Australia's largest coal project – Adani's Carmichael coal mine – from going ahead.

Attorney-General George Brandis is set to repeal a section of Australia's environment law that allows conservationists to challenge environment-based approvals for mining projects and other large developments.

“The Government has decided to protect Australian jobs by removing from the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) the provision that allows radical green activists to engage in vigilante litigation to stop important economic projects,” Senator Brandis said in a statement.

“Section 487 of the EPBC Act provides a red carpet for radical activists who have a political, but not a legal interest, in a development to use aggressive litigation tactics to disrupt and sabotage important projects.

“The activists themselves have declared that that is their objective – to use the courts not for the proper purpose of resolving a dispute between citizens, but for a collateral political purpose of bringing developments to a standstill, and sacrificing the jobs of tens of thousands of Australians in the process.”

Activist group, GetUp has today slammed the Federal Government’s move as reckless and out of step with what the Australian public want.

“Getup members funded the Federal court case against the Carmichael case because this mine is going to wreck the Reef and cook the climate,” GetUp Acting National Director, Paul Oosting said.

“The case was successful because the Minister of the Environment stuffed up. He failed to assess all the information. Now the government wants to change to rules.

“The Federal Government tried to gut Australia’s environment protection laws before and

they failed spectacularly, these laws play an important role in protecting Australians from mining encroaching on vital farmland and ecologically diverse areas.

“(This) disastrous announcement just proves that the Government has no respect for the law or for the environment and reeks of desperation.”

The Australia Institute said that a review of legal action under the Environment Protection Act by third party appeals to the Federal Court found that the appeals only affected 0.4 per cent of all projects referred under the legislation.

“Proper third party appeals – which have affected 0.4 per cent of projects are being conflated with the serious problem of what has grown to 800,000 unemployed Australians,” Executive Director of The Australia Institute, Ben Oquist said.

“Tony Abbott’s attempt to distract from his economic management failings also risks a federal corruption blow out.”

Oquist said a major review conducted by NSW ICAC reported in 2012 called for strengthening anti-corruption safeguards, including “…ensuring transparency, reducing complexity, meaningful community participation and consultation, and expanding the scope of third party merit appeals.”

He said since the EPBC Act commenced in July 2000 approximately 5500 projects have been through the EPBC process and only 33 have been taken to the Federal Court by third parties.-231354ewedr8reASDFGHJKL;’MNBVCXZ

“The proceedings only related to 22 (or 0.4 per cent) projects referred under the EPBC act,” Oquist said.

“Of the 33 actions, four were discontinued or resolved with the consent of the parties and six were ‘legally successful’, in the sense that the applicant received a judgment and/or orders in its favour.

“All other cases were legally unsuccessful.”

It’s been reported that Tasmanian-based environmental group Save the Tarkine has described the proposed changes to Federal environment protection laws as "an attack on democracy".

Spokesman Scott Jordan told ABC the Commonwealth's moves to change the EPBC Act was an attack on the principles of democracy and the ability to hold governments to account.

The Government legislation will be introduced in the House of Representatives later this week.

Currently the Federal Parliamentary Standing Committee on the Environment is also holding an inquiry to determine if environmental groups that are eligible for tax deductions are using their donors' funds to bankroll illegal activities and political campaigns.


Lina Caneva  |  Editor |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years, and Editor of Pro Bono Australia News since it was founded in 2000.

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


...


Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Poll Reveals Strong Rejection of Newstart Cuts

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 7th September 2016 at 3:10 pm

Ethical Property Australia Grows Fund to $26M Through a New Deal

Ellie Cooper

Wednesday, 24th August 2016 at 11:43 am

POPULAR

Disability Advocacy Group Fights to Restore State Funding

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:37 am

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

Donors Looking for a Personalised Experience to Give More – Study

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 8th November 2017 at 1:43 pm

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


NDIS Criterion
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!