Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  |  General

NFP Schools Program Impacting Education Outcomes


27 April 2016 at 9:20 am
Lina Caneva
An assessment of a national Not for Profit program providing highly-disadvantaged children targeted education assistance throughout their schooling has found a significant impact on their educational outcomes.

Lina Caneva | 27 April 2016 at 9:20 am


0 Comments


 Print
NFP Schools Program Impacting Education Outcomes
27 April 2016 at 9:20 am

An assessment of a national Not for Profit program providing highly-disadvantaged children targeted education assistance throughout their schooling has found a significant impact on their educational outcomes.

The research report by children’s education Not for Profit, The Smith Family highlighted the success of the organisation’s national scholarship program Learning for Life, and found that seven out of 10 students on the program were completing Year 12 better than the national average.

The Smith Family’s head of research and advocacy Anne Hampshire said the results compared favourably with six out of 10 young Australians from the lowest socioeconomic backgrounds nationally completing Year 12 or its equivalent.

The report, Improving the Educational Outcomes of Disadvantaged Young Australians: The Learning for Life Program, analysed the education program which assists about 34,000 students and their families a year in 94 communities.

“Despite significant investment in a range of initiatives over the years – by governments, non-government and philanthropic organisations – too many young Australians are still not achieving educationally,” Hampshire said.

“The potential consequences are a lifetime of disadvantage and its associated impacts, including welfare dependency and social isolation.

“However, the data we’ve gathered over the last four years is demonstrating our approach – intervening early and providing long-term educational support for very disadvantaged young people – is working.

“This is underpinning a new level of confidence and optimism for us, as the results confirm that Learning for Life is one solution to Australia’s longstanding educational problem.”

Learning for Life can start in the first year of school and run through to the completion of tertiary education. It provides a range of short programs including literacy and numeracy, learning clubs, mentoring and career activities, as well as digital and financial literacy initiatives for parents.

The report found that in 2015, more than four out of five (84 per cent) former Learning for Life students who left the program in Years 10, 11 or 12, were engaged in employment, education or training a year after leaving the program.

Hampshire said educational attainment was an important predictor of a person’s future employment, income, health and welfare prospects.

“Our research is showing that our highly targeted Learning for Life program is having a very encouraging beneficial impact. The program has been tested at scale and importantly, it’s also cost-effective at around just $1,000 per student per annum,” she said.

“It is delivering outcomes beneficial to the long-term economic and social wellbeing of young people and for national productivity and social cohesion.”

The report showed that students on the program were living in low income families. About 6,000 were of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander background. About 40 per cent of students and 50 per cent of parents/carers had a health or disability issue and over half lived in a single parent family.

“In the context of Australia’s ongoing debate about educational performance, it’s essential that we find scalable and cost-effective solutions that improve the educational attainment of disadvantaged children,” Hampshire said.

“Not addressing this issue ultimately compromises Australia’s national economic and social participation ambitions. Learning for Life is not the only answer to Australia’s educational challenge – but it is certainly making an important contribution.”


Lina Caneva  |  Editor  |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years. She was the editor of Pro Bono Australia News from when it was founded in 2000 until 2018.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Advertisement

Virtual Congress - CPA Australia

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Meet Pro Bono News’ first editorial advisory board

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 16th April 2020 at 8:02 am

Unpaid Carers Facing Significant Economic Disadvantage

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 21st August 2018 at 3:45 pm

NFPs Driving WA Economy, Report Says

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 15th February 2017 at 4:20 pm

Study into the Effect of the NDIS on Carers

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 25th January 2017 at 9:26 am

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×