subscribe to careers
News  |  2016 Budget

ACOSS Urges Super Changes for Low Income Earners

Wednesday, 17th August 2016 at 11:38 am
Lina Caneva
Welfare peak body, the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) has urged the federal government to double the proposed tax offset for people on low incomes to deliver better superannuation retirement incomes.

Wednesday, 17th August 2016
at 11:38 am
Lina Caneva



ACOSS Urges Super Changes for Low Income Earners
Wednesday, 17th August 2016 at 11:38 am

Welfare peak body, the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) has urged the federal government to double the proposed tax offset for people on low incomes to deliver better superannuation retirement incomes.

SUPER spelled out RS

ACOSS has released the new proposal, based on the federal government’s superannuation reforms, saying it will deliver better retirement incomes for 3.4 million people on low and modest incomes while strengthening federal revenue.

ACOSS CEO Dr Cassandra Goldie said the government should hold the line on its proposed curbs on tax breaks for superannuation for people on the highest incomes.

“These are modest changes. After they are introduced, the average level of government support for retirement incomes (tax breaks and pensions) for the top 1 per cent of wage earners will only fall from $850,000 to $650,000 over their lifetime. Support for those in the lowest 10 per cent is estimated by treasury to be just over $300,000,” Goldie said.

“We urge the government to take a step further and improve support for saving by people with low incomes by doubling the proposed tax offset for people with low incomes (LISTO). This would bring a much better balance to the taxing of superannuation so that tax concessions for superannuation are better targeted to the core purpose of superannuation.

“Under the present system, a person earning $200,000 saves 34 cents per dollar contributed to super but a worker on $20,000 or less receives no tax break at all. Our proposal would go some way to fixing this inequity.”

Goldie said the move would ensure scarce government resources were directed at achieving the core purpose of superannuation – delivering decent retirement incomes for people who will otherwise rely mainly on the age pension.

Either there are no banners, they are disabled or none qualified for this location!

“It will improve equity and it will put the federal budget on a more sustainable footing for the future. This is hands down the best policy outcome for Australia,” Goldie said.

“This should be paid for by not proceeding with three of the government’s changes to super that would cost $1.5 million and create even more generous tax breaks for people with high incomes. Instead of further reducing tax for people with high incomes, the system should redirect support towards those on low incomes, 60 per cent of whom are women.

“The government should not proceed with the proposed new deduction for contributions (which mainly benefits people on the top tax rate), the proposed ‘catch up contributions’ concession (which mainly benefits men on high incomes), and extending the rebate for contributions for a spouse (which will mainly benefit men with high incomes).

“Doubling the LISTO instead would improve retirement living standards for people with low incomes and reduce future age pension costs. It would benefit over one million people earning less than $20,000, 60 per cent of whom are women.

“In contrast, the government’s three new tax breaks would disproportionately benefit high income-earners who are unlikely to receive a pension in the first place. For example, only 51,000 women earning less than $79,000 a year could benefit from the ‘catch up’ proposal compared to 153,000 men earning more than $79,000 a year.

“The government’s reform proposals go a long way to curb poorly targeted tax breaks for people with very high incomes. They should do more for people on low incomes who are very poorly served by the present superannuation system.”

The five measures proposed by the federal government to cap concessions for high income earners and wealthy people, which ACOSS said it strongly supports, are:

  • the $25,000 concessional contributions cap (down from $30-35,000)
  • the 15 per cent increase in the 15 per cent contributions tax for individuals earning over $250,000
  • the $1.6 million limit on superannuation assets attracting a zero tax rate on fund earnings in the “pension phase”
  • the lifetime cap of $500,000 for non-concessional contributions
  • the proposed 15 per cent tax on fund earnings in Transition to Retirement accounts.

ACOSS said the three changes the government is contemplating to the superannuation package announced in the 2016 Budget are:

  • a new tax deduction for employee contributions, which would mainly benefit people on the top tax rate
  • extension of tax breaks for “catch up contributions”, which would mainly benefit men with high incomes rather than women with low incomes, since few people can afford to contribute over the proposed annual cap of $25,000
  • an increase in the rebate for spouse contributions which again mainly benefits men on high incomes, who can afford to contribute for their partner.

The latest ACOSS proposal:

  • replace the three measures above with a doubling of the proposed LISTO
  • that LISTO be doubled from 15 per cent to 30 per cent (and the $500 cap increased) for individuals earning less than the tax free threshold. It would remain at 15 per cent for those earning between $20,000-$37,000
  • this proposal would cost at most an extra $1.3 billion over the next four years, which is less than the government’s three proposals that boost concessions for people with high incomes.

ACOSS said a briefing paper has been provided to the government, Labor and the Greens.

Lina Caneva  |  Editor  |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years. She was the editor of Pro Bono Australia News from when it was founded in 2000 until 2018.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at


Get more stories like this


Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Fears welfare card holders could be left high and dry in bushfires

Maggie Coggan

Monday, 13th January 2020 at 4:41 pm

ACOSS fears $550M community services funding cut will hurt vulnerable people

Luke Michael

Monday, 16th December 2019 at 4:36 pm

Low-income Aussies can’t afford to invest in energy efficiency

Luke Michael

Friday, 22nd November 2019 at 3:48 pm

A sad and sorry history of Newstart

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 19th November 2019 at 8:00 am


How are Aussie charities helping in the bushfire crisis?

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th January 2020 at 3:21 pm

What impact will the bushfire crisis have on homelessness?

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:28 pm

The rise (and scepticism) of Facebook fundraisers

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 8:49 am

What about the charities?

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 8th January 2020 at 1:26 pm

subscribe to careers
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!