GTG
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

Podcast: The Purpose of Plebiscite


Tuesday, 16th August 2016 at 11:46 am
Ellie Cooper, Journalist
In this episode of Not for Podcast, Pro Bono Australia investigates whether the question of same-sex marriage should be put to the people via a plebiscite or go straight to Parliament.

Tuesday, 16th August 2016
at 11:46 am
Ellie Cooper, Journalist


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Podcast: The Purpose of Plebiscite
Tuesday, 16th August 2016 at 11:46 am

In this episode of Not for Podcast, Pro Bono Australia investigates whether the question of same-sex marriage should be put to the people via a plebiscite or go straight to Parliament.

same-sex marriage plebiscite

The Abbott government first committed to a plebiscite on same-sex marriage a year ago, and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was firm on the issue in his election campaign.

It’s now been pushed back to next year, and many groups are determined to take it off the table all together.

It’s going to be expensive, with estimated costs of $160 million, and many people fear it could be divisive, leading to a hate campaign.

Another sticking point is the non-binding result, meaning politicians will be free to disregard public opinion and stick to their own.

Yet, many feel all Australians should be given a chance to have their say.

In Purpose of Plebiscite, academics, politicians and advocates debate the issue, while a mental health expert explains the impact on the LGBTI community.

Download the transcript here.

Featured in this episode:

Produced by Ellie Cooper and Wendy Williams.


Ellie Cooper  |  Journalist  |  @ProBonoNews

Ellie Cooper is a journalist covering the social sector.


Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

One Comment

  • Laurie Patton says:

    The big danger for the Government (and eventually for all political parties) comes if they hold a plebiscite that favours SSM and some of their MP’s decide to vote against SSM in parliament because their electorate voted no. Political Scientists call it an Imperative Mandate when an elected representative votes according to the wishes of their constituents. Nothing would stop MP’s in future voting down the Government’s legislation because that’s what they think their constituents want them to do.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

One Woman’s Journey of Philanthropy

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 27th March 2018 at 8:30 am

Aged Care for Transgender and Intersex Australians Lags Behind

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 28th November 2017 at 4:11 pm

LGBTQ Philanthropy is Growing Yet Under Attack

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 23rd November 2017 at 8:39 am

POPULAR

Concerns Raised Over NDIS Barriers for Homeless People With Disability

Maggie Coggan

Tuesday, 7th August 2018 at 8:24 am

NFPs Urged to Focus on Purpose

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th August 2018 at 8:27 am

Coordinated Care at Risk Under Marketisation of the NDIS

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th August 2018 at 8:20 am

Disability Advocates Welcome Pledge to Remove NDIA Staff Cap

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 8th August 2018 at 5:12 pm

GTG
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!