MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Finance

Calls for NFPs to Help Uninsured Australia


Monday, 10th April 2017 at 2:22 pm
Wendy Williams, Journalist
Those who can’t afford insurance are being left without a “vital safety net”, according to a new report which claims the not-for-profit sector could help boost coverage for those on low incomes.


Monday, 10th April 2017
at 2:22 pm
Wendy Williams, Journalist


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Calls for NFPs to Help Uninsured Australia
Monday, 10th April 2017 at 2:22 pm

Those who can’t afford insurance are being left without a “vital safety net”, according to a new report which claims the not-for-profit sector could help boost coverage for those on low incomes.

The new discussion paper from Brotherhood of St Laurence highlights the hardship of those who can’t afford insurance and explores the ways a not-for-profit insurance platform could provide low-cost coverage.

According to the report, Uninsured Australia: The Case for Not-for-profit Insurance, two-thirds of renters lack contents cover, with those least able to replace possessions or absorb a loss also the least likely to be insured.

Brotherhood of St Laurence manager financial inclusion Tony Robinson told Pro Bono News a higher rate of coverage among low income Australians would reduce hardship when assets were damaged or lost.  

“Any number of reports have shown that lower income Australians are far more likely not to have insurance for assets and therefore in the event that those assets are damaged or lost, they suffer serious consequences,” Robinson said.

“We know this is an ongoing problem. Over the last 10 or 15 years there have been any number of reports that have show it. And affordability comes up as the key element.

“But we are currently in a position in Australia where we are leaving it solely to for-profit insurers to do something about that and that gives rise to what I’ve called in the report, ‘the irreconcilable problem’. It is effectively the square peg, round hole problem.”

Robinson said most people who did not have insurance said it was because they could not afford it, with 69 per cent in one survey giving that as the main reason.

“In the paper we look at different types of insurance and household contents insurance illustrates the problem,” he said.

“More than half of adults on Newstart allowance and Parenting Payment don’t have contents insurance. 67 per cent of Australian renters have none, and 29 per cent of households in general don’t have it.

“Further, between 10 and 15 per cent of Australian drivers have no property damage coverage, and many low income drivers experience significant financial loss when sued.”

He said a dedicated not-for-profit insurance platform could provide a suitable means of maintaining lower priced products for those who needed them most.

“For-profit insurers are motivated to optimise and maximise a return to their shareholders and that impacts directly on their ability to make the products more affordable, so we are grappling with this irreconcilable problem and I think a fresh approach is required,” he said.

“Without the need to return shareholder dividends, not-for-profit insurance could deliver products at a lower price than a for-profit entity, particularly if reinsurance does not feature as an input cost.”

The paper highlighted some low cost coverage moves being undertaken in the sector such as including content insurance with rent schemes in the United Kingdom and initiatives by Australian not-for-profit provider Good Shepherd Microfinance to develop low cost products.

“There is some evidence from parts of the world where I think a different approach is more successful,” Robinson said.

“We have the example in the UK where housing authorities incorporated insurance into the rent.

“They tried two systems, one was an opt in and one was an opt out, and I think where they had an opt out the coverage rate was around 84 per cent or something. So they organised that… with an insurer and they got a stock standard policy, there was no intermediation, there was no sale technique or sales resources required by the insurer they just provided the coverage at a minimum price and the housing authority which had a relationship with the tenant, did the rest.

“So they cut out a lot of the middle part of the typical process and because the underwriter was providing a bulk policy they were able to keep the rate pretty low. I think they quoted the rate as being less than a pound per week.”

Robinson said Good Shepherd working with Suncorp was “the best of the local initiatives”.

“That has made a start but as I say in the report, whether that can withstand the inevitable price cycles that go on within the general insurance world remains to be seen,” he said.

“That product is expected to deliver returns like any other product that a general insurer offers. And as the report points out when insurers are hit with large numbers of claims they inevitably resort to raising premiums across the board for policies just to shore up their position.”

He said one of the barriers to adopting new models was thinking about insurance in the context of natural disasters.

“I’m not saying there is anything wrong with this approach but in Australia the focus is always upon natural disasters and the damage they do to buildings,” he said.

“We’ve just had another example of this last week with Cyclone Debbie, so the issue there is focused on building insurance. A similar issue arises where too many lower income Australians don’t have insurance or are grossly underinsured and they are complicated problems.

“They are also hugely expensive problems to fix because much as we would say… it is a good thing for all Australians to be insured, one you can’t make them and secondly in some areas that are flood prone, you can’t force an insurer to offer a policy, and where they do offer them of course based on data they will say the premium must be priced prohibitively.

“So that is an even bigger conundrum, and tackling that is difficult when you’ve got different responsibilities at state and federal level and there is a need to be investing large amounts in litigation.

“I will say however I think the insurance industry has come some way in the past few years and is now at least having the conversation or at least thinking about doing things a bit differently. The partnership with Good Shepherd is a really welcome development.

“So I’m optimistic about the future but I tend to think we get fixated, like I said quite rightly, about the big building insurance problems and the impact that cyclones and bushfires have and that probably distracts us from seeing other opportunities with what might be less complex challenges such as contents insurance.”

He said the aim of the paper was to “stimulate some discussion and look at fresh approaches to solving this problem”.

“If we simply rely on private, for-profit insurers to build and maintain at a higher level the rate of insurance amongst lower income Australians we are just going to disappoint ourselves, because it’s not going to happen,” he said.

“We need to find new ways of tackling the problem and I think we have to think about models other than what for-profit insurers would typically do.

“It doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be involved but I think we have to find other ways in which those who typically lack insurance can be encouraged to take it up as easily as possible.

“So insurance with rent I think is a really good idea, there may be other forms as well but that’s the one we’ve been focusing on more recently. And I think it is one that ultimately we would hope to persuade for-profit insurers to see the merit of working that way.”


Wendy Williams  |  Journalist |  @ProBonoNews

Wendy Williams is a journalist specialising in the Not for Profit sector.

XREF

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


How do you handle complex staff issues? Do your employment ...

WorkPlacePLUS

ASI is the provider of iMIS 20 Engagement Management System ...

Advanced Solutions International

With our 1-1-1 Model, we create impact throughout the global...

Salesforce.org

From strategic planning to project facilitation, from indivi...

Creative Practice

More Suppliers


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Embracing Philanthropy’s Quirks

Fiona Higgins

Wednesday, 24th May 2017 at 4:54 pm

Beyond Savings and Towards Meaning

Lisa Grinham

Tuesday, 23rd May 2017 at 7:33 am

State Budget Versus Federal Budget: A Tale of Two Cities

Rachel McFadden

Tuesday, 16th May 2017 at 4:07 pm

Treasurer Calls for Heart and Mind Approach to Homelessness

Wendy Williams

Monday, 15th May 2017 at 5:09 pm

POPULAR

Disability Sector Warns of NDIS Staffing Turmoil

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 17th May 2017 at 4:58 pm

Forrest Makes Philanthropic History with $400M Donation

Rachel McFadden

Monday, 22nd May 2017 at 4:45 pm

Innovators and Leaders in Social Impact Measurements Awards Announced

Rachel McFadden

Wednesday, 10th May 2017 at 5:10 pm

Social Enterprise In Australia ‘Disappointing’ and ‘Self-Obsessed’

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 18th May 2017 at 12:59 pm

One Comment

  • Rosemary McKenzie-Ferguson says:

    I agree that the not-for-profit sector needs to do more, and quite possibly can do more.
    I also agree that not-for-profits are the first point of call when help is required by the wider community.
    I also agree that for the majority of not-for-profits good work is why we are all here.
    I run the only registered not for profit within the workers compensation system.
    Try explaining to the powers that be that injured workers are at risk of hunger and homelessness and the children are at risk of low to poor school attendance and all you get is a blank stare with eyes glazed over.
    Try speaking at a conference where those who would normally write cheques to fund hunger relief that their injured workers are at risk of self-harm, at risk of poor nutrition, at risk of homelessness, at risk of family breakdown.
    All you will get is the shuffling of feet until someone in the audience is game enough to stand up and say that injured workers already cost employers massive amounts of money due to the workplace injury, invariable someone will also ask why should an employer also put bread and margarine on their table as well?
    Even though the person who introduces me to the audience informs them that I am an injured worker, the question will still come “what would you know?”

    Yes not-for-profits can do more and many of us are finding new ways to raise the funds to do more whilst still holding to our core values.
    we also just need a little bit of help ourselves in order to do what our communities ask of us.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Pro Bono News

Charity and not-for-profit news delivered directly to your inbox twice a week. Stay up to date with the latest news from the country’s most valuable sector.

You have Successfully Subscribed!