Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  |  Policy

Peak Bodies Say Government’s ‘Witch-hunt’ on Single Parents is ‘Archaic’


15 May 2017 at 4:49 pm
Rachel McFadden
Australia's peak bodies for advocating for the rights of single mums have slammed the government's latest amendment to the single parent payment.


Rachel McFadden | 15 May 2017 at 4:49 pm


2 Comments


 Print
Peak Bodies Say Government’s ‘Witch-hunt’ on Single Parents is ‘Archaic’
15 May 2017 at 4:49 pm

Australia’s peak bodies for advocating for the rights of single mums have slammed the government’s latest amendment to the single parent payment.

In the 2017 budget, which aimed to “crackdown on welfare cheats”, the government announced from September 2018 single parents receiving welfare will need a third party to verify they are in fact single.

CEOs from Council of Single Mothers and their Children Victoria (CSMCV) and the National Council of Single Mothers and their Children (NCSMC) have condemned the move, calling it disrespectful, humiliating and archaic.

“It harps back to the 1970s when single mums used to be in fear of people coming into their homes to check the closets for men’s clothes,” CSMCV CEO Jenny Davidson said.

Terese Edwards, CEO of NCSMC, said Australia was slipping back to a “shame culture” where single mothers are operating under a cloud of suspicion, reminiscent of the 1970s.

“What women have reported to us of that era were there were raids, visits and checks,” Edwards said.

“I really detest what it says about women, unless you can get third party, we won’t trust or believe you.

“We recognise that our welfare system needs to be robust and transparent to protect those who would falter and fall without it. However, I have seen no evidence that the single parent payment is rorted.”

Edwards and Davidson said the third party verification system was fraught with problems, from hostile third parties “dobbing in” single mothers, social surveillance that breached the privacy of a single mother and her children, to unfounded assumptions that a new partner would take on the financial responsibilities of a woman’s children.

“The assumption here is that if a woman has a relationship that the new partner is then taking on the cost of raising her children. That is a big assumption,” Davidson said.

“Women have the right to start a relationship without asking a new partner to take on the costs of raising their children.”

Edwards said the third party verification system went against the principle of being innocent until proven guilty.

“I know one woman who had someone phone into Centrelink to say she wasn’t a single mum. Her payment was automatically suspended which immediately caused financial hardship,” Edwards said.

They said single mothers and their children were at high risk of poverty.

According to the ACOSS Poverty in Australia 2016 report, solo parents, 84 per cent of whom are single mothers, have the highest prevalence of poverty of all family types and one third of single parent families are living below the poverty line.

“One of the surveys we conducted found that a number of single mums had reported forgoing the essentials to get by; skipping meals and medical appointments,” Edwards said.

But one of the most concerning reports, Edwards said, was that due to severe financial insecurity, 22 per cent of women in abusive relationships had returned to the relationship for some financial reprieve.

Edwards and Davidson said the third party verification was the latest in a string of attacks on single mums, one of the most devastating, was the stringent rules Newstart dictated once the youngest offspring turned eight.

“It fails to recognise the unwaged labour that goes into running a home and keeping a family,” Edwards said.

Davidson said instead of vilifying single mums the government should focus on collecting child support payments.

In a submission to the Australian National Audit Office in November 2016, CSMCV said single mothers have faced and continue to face, long emotional struggles to have their former husband or partner share the costs of raising their children.

“Figures from 2012 report $1.2 billion in unpaid child support payments, largely owed by fathers. This does not include private arrangements, which represents $2 billion of the total $3.5 billion in child support. 100 per cent compliance is assumed in the payment of privately arranged child support, but anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests this is far from the case. For some single mothers, these privately agreed arrangements are a continuing source of distress and dispute,” the report said.

Davidson said: “What the governments should be doing is chasing them to follow up on their child support. That is what they should be cracking down on and there is no discussion on that whatsoever.”


Rachel McFadden  |  Journalist  |  @ProBonoNews

Rachel is a journalist specialising in the social sector.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Advertisement

CFRE

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

2 comments

  • Avatar gandalph@trollmagic.net says:

    The actions of the current Federal Government in relation to those in the weakest positions in our society are nothing short of scurrilous.

    One would have thought that in 2017, we would have reached a stage beyond class warfare and a two-tiered society of rich and poor. – We haven’t.
    This is yet another example of this government’s increasing use of tactics more akin to majority world dictatorships and extreme regimes than it is of an enlightened and democratic society that cares for equity.
    Regardless of LNP rhetoric, this government is not one that acts for the good of the people and the sooner it is booted out, the better.

  • Avatar Pamella says:

    Why shouldn’t a man support his partners child or she go out to work . I know so a few who shouldn’t be getting single parent payment and as for a reference from a second person it’s a joke there mother or family menber are not going to say any different. About time Australia woke up .

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Election mania: What should I do during caretaker?

Neil Pharaoh

Monday, 21st September 2020 at 4:24 pm

Close to 150,000 jobs at risk due to welfare cuts

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 15th September 2020 at 5:02 pm

JobSeeker recipients fear push back under poverty line

Maggie Coggan

Friday, 11th September 2020 at 4:51 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×

We need your help.

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, Pro Bono Australia has seen a devastating fall in advertising and less people posting on our job board, which is how we fund our free news service. You can show us that you value the work we do by making a contribution.

 Make a contribution 

You have Successfully Subscribed!