Salary Survey 2019
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

Remote Work-for-the-Dole Program Under Review


Friday, 15th December 2017 at 10:25 am
Luke Michael
The federal government’s controversial work-for-the-dole Community Development Program (CDP) is set to come under review, with the launch of a discussion paper on future arrangements for the scheme.


Friday, 15th December 2017
at 10:25 am
Luke Michael


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Remote Work-for-the-Dole Program Under Review
Friday, 15th December 2017 at 10:25 am

The federal government’s controversial work-for-the-dole Community Development Program (CDP) is set to come under review, with the launch of a discussion paper on future arrangements for the scheme.

The CDP is a scheme which looks to support remote job seekers to “build skills, address barriers and contribute to their communities through a range of flexible activities”.

But the program came under heavy scrutiny at a recent senate inquiry, with concerns voiced around unrealistic participation expectations and harsh penalties leaving people without funds.

On Thursday the Minister for Indigenous Affairs, Nigel Scullion, announced the launch of a formal consultation on a new employment and participation model for remote Australia.

“Supporting people in remote Australia to gain skills and find jobs delivers many benefits – for themselves, their families and the broader community,” Scullion said.

“I am committed to ensuring job seekers in remote Australia are supported to get the training and work experience they need to transition into a job and make a contribution to their community. It is essential that reforms are developed in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and remote communities, so I encourage people to share their views.

“The discussion paper explores how to grow the remote labour market, provide more incentives to job seekers, give communities more control and greater decision-making, and improve the support available to job seekers so they can move from welfare and into work.”

One of the options for a new scheme would be for a more simplified system, “relying less on a national welfare system, and more on local control and decision making”.    

This could include a wage-based model which provides weekly payments to job seekers.

Under the current scheme, CDP participants must do 25 hours per week of “work-like” activities to receive welfare payments – which is up to three times longer than what’s required for unemployed people in metropolitan areas.

Scheme participants were fined one day’s Centrelink allowance if they missed one of their scheduled activities or are late.

But the recent senate inquiry heard these punishments were unreasonable, due to the long distances people often had to travel to meet their work commitments.

Scullion said the consultation would guide the development of a new employment program “expanding on the success of the CDP”.

“The CDP has supported remote job seekers into over 21,000 jobs and overturned the failures of Labor’s Remote Jobs and Communities Program (RJCP) which saw attendance under the program drop to 6 per cent,” he said.

“However, more needs to be done to maintain the momentum to get people into work.

“I am committed to a broad consultation and will continue to engage on remote employment widely, including with remote communities, job seekers, the Prime Minister’s Indigenous Advisory Council, Empowered Communities leaders and CDP providers.”

But in wake of the Senate inquiry findings, Labor has attacked the CDP scheme. In a joint statement from Labor senators Jenny McAllister, Patrick Dodson, Sue Lines and Malarndirri McCarthy, they said this review was needed to address “the failure of the CDP program”.

“Less than six weeks ago the minister [Scullion] was praising CDP as a success but in a complete turnaround, reports of a CDP discussion paper released today show the government has conceded the multiple failings of CDP,” they said.

“The minister’s belated discussion paper on proposed changes does not take into account the damage the discriminatory CDP continues to cause on communities.

“The reality is many people on communities will still go hungry this Christmas because of the minister’s failure to deal with this discriminatory and punitive CDP program.”

Discussion paper submissions are open to the public until Friday 9 February 2018.


Luke Michael  |  Journalist  |  @luke_michael96

Luke Michael is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.


Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

One Comment

  • Avatar Leanne White says:

    I am a Newstart Allowance recipient. I have recently (November 2018) turned 60 years old. A week ago I had a Job Plan drawn up by my CDP remote location employment provider called MEEDAC in Kalbarri, WA. I am required to search for 2 jobs per month, attend interviews, appointments etc and participate in 30 hours per fortnight of Mutual Obligation activity for 52 weeks per year. A 60 year old on the metropolitan Job Active program is only required to participate in 10 hours per fortnight of Mutual Obligation activity, in addition to job searches and attending interviews and appointments for 26 weeks per year. How can a difference of 20 hours of Mutual Obligation activity between metropolitan and remotely located participants be condoned in a just society? I understand that there is a difference due to limited employment opportunities in remote locations…but 30 hours fortnightly for 52 weeks compared to 10 hours fortnightly for 26 weeks! Its inequitable, biased and punishes those of us who choose to live in remote towns for the benefit of the town! Country towns all over Australia are dying as the younger generation move to metropolitan suburbs.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Repeated failure to support people on the lowest incomes

Cassandra Goldie

Thursday, 11th April 2019 at 7:30 am

A look at the 2019 Budget

Andrew Cairns

Wednesday, 3rd April 2019 at 12:32 pm

Government turns to automation to save $2 billion in welfare payments

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 3rd April 2019 at 12:00 pm

Back in black… but a missed opportunity?

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 3rd April 2019 at 10:08 am

POPULAR

‘They don't see eye-to-eye’: Leadership turmoil engulfs the ACNC

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 16th April 2019 at 8:24 am

Disability groups call for conflicting commissioners to step down

Maggie Coggan

Monday, 8th April 2019 at 4:47 pm

An (unlikely) friend in need

Maggie Coggan

Saturday, 6th April 2019 at 12:00 pm

NFPs struggling to measure their impact

Luke Michael

Thursday, 11th April 2019 at 4:33 pm

Salary Survey 2019
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!