subscribe to careers
News  |  Fundraising

Accounting Changes Raise Red Tape Concerns for Charities

Wednesday, 29th August 2018 at 5:14 pm
Maggie Coggan
It is feared the proposed removal of special purpose financial statements (SPFS) by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) will cause a “massive burden” for smaller charities.

Wednesday, 29th August 2018
at 5:14 pm
Maggie Coggan



Accounting Changes Raise Red Tape Concerns for Charities
Wednesday, 29th August 2018 at 5:14 pm

It is feared the proposed removal of special purpose financial statements (SPFS) by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) will cause a “massive burden” for smaller charities.

The AASB said in a recent paper they had to review SPFS because of “consistency, comparability and transparency” issues within financial reports, which did not meet international standards.   

Instead of SPFS, which organisations design themselves and only need to comply with six accounting standards, a general purpose financial statement (GPFS) must comply with all accounting standards.

Justice Connect COO, Sophie Gordon-Clark, told Pro Bono News the changes may cause problems, in particular for small charities with a low overhead.

“A big issue is the capacity for small not for profits to be able to do that especially when they’re reporting on a cash basis and they haven’t even gone down the path of accruing accounting,” Gordon-Clark said.

She said smaller charities didn’t often have the resources to deal with large audits such as this.

“It puts a massive burden on the people who are running NFPs, especially volunteer-run organisations which may not have the knowledge and the resources to comply,” she said.

While Gordon-Clark understood the proposed changes were designed to align Australia’s accounting standards internationally, she said creating a “blanket policy” was the wrong way forward.

“If this was a move to build on the standardisation… and making it specific to NFPs as opposed to business, then that might be something that would be useful,” she said.

She added it was important the sector understood what these changes would bring, and made their “voices heard”.

“Otherwise there are decisions being made by AASB without the knowledge of what that impact actually is, by the people who are making and preparing those SPFS,” she said.

“Until it came up to their annual audit or their annual report they probably wouldn’t even pick it up… It’s one of those things that we sort of think ‘oh that’s not really us,’ and you don’t worry about it.”

The chair of AASB, Kris Peach, told Pro Bono News there was more than “one type of GPFS” and for the charity and NFP sector, it would be separated into three tiers depending on the organisation’s revenue.

“We’ll be working with the ACNC to work out what is the appropriate reporting for each of the different tiers,” Peach said.

She said this was just the beginning of the consultation period however, as they needed to see where the “ACNC legislative review goes” before making any firm decisions.

Peach also said the NFP and charity sector would play a big part in the process.

“One of our key objectives is to make sure that we get extensive input from this sector,” she said.  

“The message to the sector is, don’t panic yet… there’s no intention there will be any removal [of the SPFS] for a little while.”  

Maggie Coggan  |  Journalist  |  @MaggieCoggan

Maggie Coggan is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at

Get more stories like this


One Comment

  • Avatar David Hardidge says:

    It is important for the NFP sector to participate in this discussion. The ACNC review recommendations, if implemented, to lift the small threshold to $1 million will help smaller charities.

    For those advocating the retention of special purpose financial statements, I suggest you address the AASB’s concerns on their research on how the system operates in practice. Which is basically that the system is not working as intended. Issues include inconsistent application, lack of level playing field, disparity in disclosures, and the users not knowing what they are getting (with some entities picking and choosing measurement standards and not disclosing which ones).

    Personally, I would like to see a simplified measurement and disclosure framework for medium and large charities. Though that brings in its own challenges as simplifications mean measurement differences from the accounting standards that people are used to.

    We also need to address service performance information – aren’t most donors interested in the actual outcomes?

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Authorities look to stamp out bushfire donation scams

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th January 2020 at 3:49 pm

Same same, but different – 2019 in review

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 18th December 2019 at 5:13 pm

Government ordered to respond to fundraising inquiry

Luke Michael

Thursday, 28th November 2019 at 4:12 pm

Animal rights group slams decision to strip charity of its status

Maggie Coggan

Tuesday, 19th November 2019 at 5:05 pm


How are Aussie charities helping in the bushfire crisis?

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th January 2020 at 3:21 pm

What impact will the bushfire crisis have on homelessness?

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:28 pm

The rise (and scepticism) of Facebook fundraisers

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 8:49 am

What about the charities?

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 8th January 2020 at 1:26 pm

subscribe to careers
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!