subscribe to careers
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Finance

High Court Ruling Another Win for Charitable Advocacy


Wednesday, 30th January 2019 at 4:34 pm
Luke Michael, Journalist
The not-for-profit sector is celebrating another win for charitable advocacy after the High Court struck down electoral laws imposing a stricter spending cap for third-party campaigners including charities.


Wednesday, 30th January 2019
at 4:34 pm
Luke Michael, Journalist


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
High Court Ruling Another Win for Charitable Advocacy
Wednesday, 30th January 2019 at 4:34 pm

The not-for-profit sector is celebrating another win for charitable advocacy after the High Court struck down electoral laws imposing a stricter spending cap for third-party campaigners including charities.

On Tuesday, the High Court unanimously ruled that the New South Wales’ Electoral Funding Act breached the Australian Constitution’s implied freedom of political communication.

This bill slashed the amount third-party groups could spend on election campaigns from just over $1 million to $500,000, but increased the amount political parties could spend to $11 million.   

Six unions led by Unions NSW filed a High Court challenge to the new laws in August 2018, arguing the changes would stifle public criticism of the NSW Berejiklian government during this year’s state election campaign.

Chief Justice Susan Kiefel and Justices Virginia Bell and Patrick Keane said in a joint statement the NSW government had not established that the stricter cap was needed to prevent the drowning out of other voices during an election campaign, which was the government’s identified purpose.  

The decision was labelled a win for the NFP sector, with Community Council for Australia CEO David Crosbie telling Pro Bono News it protected the rights of every Australian to participate fully in democracy and advocate for the policies they believed in.

“In recent debates about electoral reform in Australia, there has been a tendency of some politicians to suggest that political parties should be the main players in the political process, and that others – like some charities – are inappropriately entering into the political space when they advocate on an issue,” Crosbie said.

“In fact, electors should be the main players in any democratic process and if electors choose to collectively support a charity and advocate for the policies they believe in, that can only be a positive for the democratic process.”

Crosbie said as a consequence of the ruling, no government or political party in Australia could impose limitations on charities greater than the limitations imposed on political parties.

“This is a win for democracy and a win for all non-political campaigners,” he said.

Krystian Seibert, an industry fellow at the Centre for Social Impact at Swinburne University, agreed the ruling was a win for the sector.

He told Pro Bono News that charities engaged in advocacy and grassroots campaigning, would have found it much harder to launch any campaign that influenced voters at scale because of the restrictions.

“It would’ve also made it harder for charities and NFPs to collaborate with each other and contribute to sharing the costs of these campaigns,” Seibert said.

He added the struck down restrictions were an example of how governments could use electoral laws to protect themselves from critics and shield themselves from accountability.

“It’s likely that the NSW government will be able to reintroduce an expenditure cap on third parties, but it will have to tread very carefully given the lines laid down in the High Court’s decision and the need to be able to clearly justify the level of the cap,” he said.

The secretary of Unions NSW, Mark Morey, said the High Court ruling was a welcome repeal of “draconian laws”.

“What the High Court has said is that a government cannot rig an election, cannot silence its critics in NSW by simply passing legislation,” Morey told reporters on Tuesday.

But NSW Treasurer Dominic Perrottet lamented the decision, issuing a statement that said unions would now be able to “exercise free rein on spending their member’s dues – without giving them a say – on wall-to-wall advertising during the NSW election campaign”.  

The NSW election will be held on 23 March.


Luke Michael  |  Journalist  |  @luke_michael96

Luke Michael is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.


Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

GetUp Ruling to Protect Issues-based Advocacy by Charities

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 20th February 2019 at 5:21 pm

So What Does the Second Object of the ACNC Act Mean?

Krystian Seibert

Tuesday, 19th February 2019 at 8:37 am

DGR Status Opens Doors for More Investment in Women

Maggie Coggan

Tuesday, 19th February 2019 at 8:20 am

NSW Pledges to Halve Rough Sleepers by 2025

Luke Michael

Monday, 18th February 2019 at 5:14 pm

POPULAR

‘Toxic’ Amnesty Workplace Sparks Criticism of Australian Social Sector Culture

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 13th February 2019 at 5:29 pm

Disability Services Fighting to Stay Afloat

Luke Michael

Thursday, 21st February 2019 at 8:32 am

Program Looks to Halve Electricity Costs for Charities

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 12th February 2019 at 4:26 pm

Instagram Wants to Make it Easier to Donate to Charities

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 12th February 2019 at 4:33 pm

subscribe to news
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!