Guide to Giving
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD

Outrage over funding for couples counselling in domestic violence package


Tuesday, 30th July 2019 at 8:31 am
Maggie Coggan
The Senate has passed a motion criticising the government’s plan to fund couples counselling for abuse perpetrators and their victims. 


Tuesday, 30th July 2019
at 8:31 am
Maggie Coggan


3 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Outrage over funding for couples counselling in domestic violence package
Tuesday, 30th July 2019 at 8:31 am

The Senate has passed a motion criticising the government’s plan to fund couples counselling for abuse perpetrators and their victims. 

Greens deputy leader Larissa Waters said it was an important motion that went to the heart of expert advice from frontline domestic and family violence service providers.

“Frontline services desperately need more funding. However, to allocate funding for mandatory or even optional, but forced, couples counselling in incidences of violence in a relationship where other services are struggling for funding is against the advice of these expert bodies,” Waters said.  

The latest debate in the Senate comes days after women’s safety groups were left dumbfounded following the Morrison government’s confirmation it would go ahead with the funding.

The funding is part of a $10 million domestic violence package to expand specialist family violence services which include counselling and dispute resolution for individuals or couples. 

Anti-domestic violence and women’s organisations have said couples counselling where domestic violence was a factor put women in even more danger, and hindered their chances of escaping the relationship. 

Rachael Natoli, CEO of the Lokahi Foundation and a survivor of domestic violence, told Pro Bono News women in abusive situations were often coerced into attending counselling sessions, and they did not achieve any positive outcomes.    

“You’re not going to be honest about the fact that you’re in an abusive relationship with the counselor because the consequences that you’re going to suffer are too great a risk,” Natoli said. 

“Because while you are probably safe during the session, there is no one that can protect you when you leave. You have to go home with the perpetrator.” 

But Federal Minister for Social Services Anne Ruston said the motion was misleading. 

She argued the expanded family violence services package was focused on providing additional services for children who witness or experience violence.

“Specialist family violence services do not force survivors to undergo counselling with perpetrators, and all funded services must be delivered in accordance with the National Outcome Standards for Perpetrator Interventions,” Minister Ruston said.

She said the government would not fund activities that did not demonstrate strong safety practices. 

Hayley Foster, the CEO of Women’s Safety NSW, told Pro Bono News the idea that this plan was informed by “the experts” was wrong.  

“The government said that it was under the advice of the experts, but we’re the experts… and we didn’t advise them to do this,” she said. 

“We are now asking them what the rationale behind this is and why they are making this decision.” 

Only invited organisations are able to apply for the funding, and nearly half of those organisations are religious based.   

Foster said no information on how or why these particular organisations were selected had been shared with expert organisations, and the fact that so many of them were religious based raised questions. 

There is also no requirement that the relationship service has experience delivering specialist domestic violence services. 

“Many of the women who have shared their experiences have been referred to couples counseling through religious associations, and despite the abuse they had experienced they had been supported to stay committed to the relationship and to make it work,” Foster said. 

“We really want the government to reassure us that as a secular institution, they are supporting women to be able to escape violent relationships.” 

Waters also attacked this aspect of the government’s plan, calling for trained experts to be providing services, not faith based organisations. 

The motion calls on the government to ensure all government funded counselling services for family violence are delivered by expert family violence service providers and to adequately fund frontline domestic violence and crisis housing services, including the provision of safe and specific family violence support services for Aboriginal, culturally and linguistically diverse, and LGBTIQ communities.

A change.org petition calling on Ruston and the Morrison government to rethink the funding package has also now received more than 4,000 signatures. 

Natoli said raising awareness, like with the petition, was the best way to effect change.        

“We need to speak to people who are advocates, who are survivors, on why it is not going to work,” she said.  

“Governments need to listen. They need to take that on board and say, ‘you know what? We’ve made a mistake here. Let’s let’s sit down and let’s work out how we can stop this before it causes damage.”  

 

If this article raised any personal issues, please call 1800 RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or Lifeline on 13 11 14.  


Maggie Coggan  |  Journalist  |  @MaggieCoggan

Maggie Coggan is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.


Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

3 Comments

  • Avatar jcongues@familycare.net.au says:

    Thanks for raising this Maggie. It is certainly very concerning to think that the Australian government thinks it’s okay to mandate couples therapy particularly when domestic violence is obviously part of the issue. And yes, it would be great if there was some transparency around who the ‘experts’ are advising the government.

  • Avatar Patrick Cora says:

    Why is there no link to the petition?

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Vinnies backflip on Newstart compromise

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 20th August 2019 at 3:09 pm

Minister for the NDIS included in Morrison’s new-look cabinet

Luke Michael

Monday, 27th May 2019 at 2:54 pm

POPULAR

Disability groups call for better quality plans in NDIS review

Luke Michael

Monday, 12th August 2019 at 4:51 pm

Gillian Triggs to shine a light on Australia’s refugee treatment

Maggie Coggan

Monday, 12th August 2019 at 5:04 pm

Australians’ generosity a “mixed bag”

Maggie Coggan

Tuesday, 20th August 2019 at 8:23 am

ACNC takes action on charity linked to controversial animal farm

Luke Michael

Monday, 19th August 2019 at 5:24 pm

Guide to Giving
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!