Close Search

Australia’s housing crisis is everyone’s problem

5 August 2019 at 3:42 pm
Olivia Killeen
Unpacking this year’s Homelessness Week theme “housing ends homelessness”, Olivia Killeen, Sacred Heart Mission’s social policy officer, explains why a myriad of services and approaches are necessary to tackle the unprecedented demand for homelessness services as well as address housing affordability. 

Olivia Killeen | 5 August 2019 at 3:42 pm


Australia’s housing crisis is everyone’s problem
5 August 2019 at 3:42 pm

Unpacking this year’s Homelessness Week theme “housing ends homelessness”, Olivia Killeen, Sacred Heart Mission’s social policy officer, explains why a myriad of services and approaches are necessary to tackle the unprecedented demand for homelessness services as well as address housing affordability. 

Homelessness in Australia is worsening; rough sleeping is increasing, demand for services is getting higher and we are in a national housing crisis. But why, in Australia, in the 21st century – the land of a “fair go” and opportunity – do we have 116,000 Australians experiencing homelessness on any given night? 

A large contributing factor to the housing crisis in the last few decades, has been laws such as “negative gearing” which have encouraged people on middle and higher incomes, not just professional developers, to buy investment properties. As a result, there is less housing available to buy or rent, which increases the demand and therefore price and competition. 

This has created a “landlord’s market”, and at the same time, people’s incomes are stagnating. Rents increase on the regular, and soon enough, people are finding themselves struggling to pay bills, feed their families, access necessary health care or pay for travel costs. 

For renters, leases in Australia are generally only for 12 months at a time, which creates uncertainty for tenants, particularly those who want to rent long term. Even if people find somewhere cheaper to live, the costs of moving house are high. Often, people cannot afford to relocate and then find themselves stuck living in a home outside their budget, which eats away at their savings.

This means for many, finding an affordable house is like discovering a four-leaf clover. Housing that is still affordable these days is generally only found in regional areas or “growth corridors”; outer urban areas allocated for planned and significant urban development.

The challenge with moving to a growth area is that new housing estates are built first, but it takes a long time for essential services such as hospitals and schools and transport to catch up. It can take longer for job opportunities to exist in these areas, which forces people to travel further to access services and work. It also forces people to live in areas outside of their comfort zone, where they don’t have a sense of belonging. Without a connection to the community, people are more likely to experience poor health and isolation. 

It’s also incredibly difficult to save money to buy a home, meaning people are taking longer to buy their first home or will never achieve “the Great Australian Dream”. Everyday Australians are priced out of the housing market. Many others stretch their budgets to buy a home, but any bump in the road – a sudden illness, an unexpected bill or loss of income – can mean they’re unable to pay their bills and then fall behind. 

The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) measures household affordability and housing stress, which is when households spend the majority of their income on housing costs. AHURI do this by using the 30:40 indicator; for households in the bottom 40 per cent of income distribution, spending any more than 30 per cent of income on housing (mortgage or rent, insurance and other taxes) indicates housing stress. 

For households who are on higher incomes, but who can just afford to spend more than 30 per cent of their income on housing, this limits their ability to save money and prepare for the proverbial “rainy day”. The 30 per cent rule may not be the threshold of housing stress for the entire community; but no matter where you fall in income distribution, the risk of falling into housing stress is more apparent than you might think. Recent research from Finder shows almost half of Australia’s workers would run out of money in under a month if they lost their job. One in five of us has less than $250 in our savings accounts, according to AMP Bank. The reality is, it wouldn’t take much for many of us to find ourselves struggling to stay afloat, or be at risk of homelessness – the housing crisis is everyone’s problem. 

For people on Newstart, very low incomes, receiving pensions or who are unable to find work, the situation is worse because there is no affordable rental property in Australia. Homelessness has increased by 13.7 per cent in the last four years. This number is growing every day and takes many forms; people sleeping rough and in their cars, couch surfing, staying in overcrowded accommodation or paying astronomical fees in private rooming houses. To put it simply – people cannot get back on their feet when they aren’t housed. So how do we fix it? 

First, we need rapid investment in safe and affordable public and social housing across the country, that suits people based on a variety of situations. This should be close to a range of services and in differing communities inter-mixed with private housing stock because this is known to prevent societal divisions based on socio-economic status and reduce income inequality. 

As well as housing, people need the right level of support for their circumstances. At Sacred Heart Mission, we know with the right support, people can stay out of homelessness permanently. Additional services or wrap-around services are required to give people the support they need to stay in housing. This individualised planned support could be focused on improving mental health and wellbeing, resolving drug and alcohol issues, building life skills, increasing connections with community and contributing to society through economic and social inclusion – such as paid work or volunteering. 

Housing ends homelessness, coupled with support; this is critical to break the cycle of homelessness. Support is also critical to prevent people who are in housing stress from entering homelessness. We need strong leadership at all levels of government to make housing affordable for everyone. Access to safe, affordable and secure housing is a right that should be afforded to everyone in our society.

Olivia Killeen  |  @ProBonoNews

Olivia Killeen is Sacred Heart Mission’s social policy officer.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at or download our contributor guidelines.
Most Viewed


Webinar Value Packs

Get more stories like this



  • Um What says:

    Sorry, but this has never been the land of a “fair go.”

    This is a far right economic system that has nothing to do with fair goes.

    • Andrew King says:

      Your article says that negative hearing is a critical problem because it allows middle income people to buy investment properties, meaning fewer houses to buy and rent. This doesn’t make sense. Investment properties are rental properties and negative gearing only helps people provide rental properties. Negative gearing increases the supply of rentals it doesn’t decrease them.

      • paul says:

        Sure. Assuming you are not a pensioner. The current demand for properties is for low-income earners and pensioners who are not able to afford paying full rents. As the baby Boomers now flock into retirement, they are all struggling to find affordable housing and long term leases for security.

      • Clancy says:

        Actually it does make sense – because the speculative pressure on house prices from investors driven by negative gearing subsidies keeps many would-be first home owners out of the housing market – and in the rental market. So more people are renting than there would otherwise be. In that way, negative gearing increases *demand* for rentals, not supply – it would only be increasing supply if new buildings were being constructed with it rather than concentrating the ownership of exising housing stock in relatively fewer hands…the controversy of the existing policy is that it has been applied to existing dwellings which hasn’t stimulated an increase in housing supply, but simply encouraged speculative investment in real estate subsidised by taxpayers.

Your email address will not be published.


How do you solve a problem like homelessness?

Danielle Kutchel

Monday, 23rd May 2022 at 4:26 pm

A journey to discovery: Learning how other countries ended homelessness

Wendy Williams

Thursday, 19th May 2022 at 8:48 am

Renovating the great Australian dream

Brugh O'Brien

Tuesday, 10th May 2022 at 4:09 pm

Housing forum showcases fixes for a broken ecosystem

Danielle Kutchel

Monday, 9th May 2022 at 4:58 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook