Close Search

Community groups slam proposed Religious Discrimination Act

2 October 2019 at 5:09 pm
Luke Michael
Civil society leaders are voicing their concerns about the proposed Religious Discrimination Act, which they say privileges religious belief over other human rights.

Luke Michael | 2 October 2019 at 5:09 pm


Community groups slam proposed Religious Discrimination Act
2 October 2019 at 5:09 pm

Civil society leaders are voicing their concerns about the proposed Religious Discrimination Act, which they say privileges religious belief over other human rights.

The bill – which introduces religious exemptions to Australia’s race and disability discrimination acts for the first time – has come under fire for including provisions allowing medical practitioners to refuse treatment on religious grounds.

With the consultation period for the bill closing on Wednesday, advocates representing women, LGBTIQ+ people, people with disability, people of colour, and workers are lodging submissions criticising the legislation.

Anna Brown, the CEO of Equality Australia, said exemptions to long-standing anti-discrimination laws were completely unwarranted.

She said while it was important that people of faith were protected from discrimination, giving new privileges to people of faith and overriding existing protections from discrimination for LGBTIQ people and others was unacceptable.

“No religious belief should overwhelm the right of a person to live, work, study, and access healthcare with dignity,” Brown said.

“New, radical provisions go too far and hand a sword to people of faith to use their religious beliefs to attack others in our community. This bill is not like other anti-discrimination legislation.”

The bill will override Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits behaviour that “offends, humiliates, intimidates, insults or ridicules” other people.

This has drawn the ire of Jessica Munday, the secretary of Unions Tasmania.

“Tasmania has the best Anti-Discrimination Act in the country which has served Tasmanians well for over two decades,” Munday said.

“The Morrison government wants to override Tasmanian anti-discrimination law to pass legislation that will remove protections for Tasmanians to be free from discrimination at work and in other aspects of their lives. This is completely unacceptable.”

Renee Carr, the executive director of Fair Agenda, added that the bill would be detrimental to reproductive health.

“We are extremely concerned that current provisions will increase barriers people face in accessing reproductive healthcare – including contraceptives, the morning-after pill, assisted reproductive technology, and in some states, abortion care,” Carr said.

But Attorney-General Christian Porter has argued the bill was the result of extensive consultation.

“Whilst there will always be competing views on issues such as this, the government considers the [draft bill] strikes the right balance in the interests of all Australians,” Porter said.

This bill also includes a recommendation from the Ruddock review to amend the Charities Act 2013 to clarify that religious charities advocating traditional marriage would not be at risk of losing their charitable status.

But legal experts believe this amendment is unnecessary, and have warned that changing the Charities Act for one type of charitable purpose could spark a list of others seeking similar clarification.

Luke Michael  |  Journalist  |  @luke_michael96

Luke Michael is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Get more stories like this


One comment

  • Avatar Ewan Filmer says:

    There is not one proponent of the legislation sourced from the community and three against quoted extensively. How about some effort at balance in the coverage of this issue from Pro Bono?

    Luke, rather than simply being an apologist for those who oppose anyone in the public square who has faith, please recognise that there is also a lot of disquiet from faith organisations and individuals who do not profess any faith, who need much better legislation that what is currently offered.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The impact of the pandemic on older women

Augustine Zycher

Monday, 7th September 2020 at 6:21 pm

Does COVID-19 force us to re-think the ‘Man Box rules’?

Matt Tyler

Monday, 24th August 2020 at 6:15 pm

Gender equality in Australia is on the decline. Here’s what could fix it

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 5th March 2020 at 8:22 am

‘We owe it to everyone who fought to protect our legacy’

Paige Burton

Monday, 9th December 2019 at 4:43 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook