Close Search
News  |  Governance

Welfare Sector Fights ‘Crackdown’

31 March 2011 at 1:06 pm
Staff Reporter
Just one day after the ACOSS Conference, the Federal Opposition has outlined a crackdown on welfare, with Tony Abbott unveiling a raft of measures including abolishing the dole to people in areas where there are plenty of jobs.

Staff Reporter | 31 March 2011 at 1:06 pm


Welfare Sector Fights ‘Crackdown’
31 March 2011 at 1:06 pm

Just one day after the ACOSS Conference, the Federal Opposition has outlined a crackdown on welfare, with Tony Abbott unveiling a raft of measures including abolishing the dole to people in areas where there are plenty of jobs.

Abbott wants to force the long-term unemployed onto work-for-the-dole schemes, quarantine half of people's benefits to be spent on the necessities of life, and get "non-permanent" disability pensioners back to work.

The two-day ACOSS Conference in Melbourne has only just wrapped up after warning of the dangers of extending welfare quarantining across the country as proposed by the Gillard Government.

The CEO of the welfare peak body, ACOSS, Dr Cassandra Goldie says the Opposition’s plan is mean and extreme and it simply won't work.

She says the policy suggests that people who are unemployed are lazy and simply don't want to work.

She says this is not the experience of the welfare sector.

UnitingCare Australia says better services and supports will ensure long-term unemployed Australians find meaningful, long-term employment.

In a speech delivered at the Queensland Chamber of Commerce, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott promoted measures he says will encourage the long term unemployed into work.

The Opposition Leader called for mandatory work for the dole for people under 50 receiving unemployment benefits for six months or more; welfare quarantining for all long-term unemployed people; for changes to the disability pension which would differentiate between people with permanent disabilities and those who can readily be treated; and suspending the payment of unemployment benefits in places where there are unfilled, unskilled jobs.

But UnitingCare Australia’s National Director, Lin Hatfield Dodds says Abbott’s proposed policies are a revamp of old ideas that did not make a dent in the number of long term unemployed people in the last 10 years.

Hatfield Dodds says matching people to jobs is more complex than the simple arithmetic suggested in today’s speech.

She says more real training and education are needed to skill people for long-term job opportunities.

Unitingcare says in its experience most people want to work. They want to participate in their community and contribute to their own well being and to the well being of their families, but often they are not ready for a job.

The UnitingCare network provides social services to over a million people each year in 1,300 sites in remote, regional and metropolitan Australia. The network employs 35,000 staff who are supported by 24,000 volunteers.

Prime Minister, Julia Gillard has already warned of "tough love" ahead for young Australians shirking work which will be revealed in a raft of measures in the May Federal Budget, including the extension of the compulsory income management scheme currently operating in the Northern Territory.

Speaking at the ACOSS Conference in Melbourne this week, Shadow Finance Minister Andrew Robb made no mention of the Abbott plan, however other speakers at the conference came out strongly against a number of the measures proposed by Abbott.

ACOSS President Simon Schrapel told the conference that Australia is seeing the spread of a very insidious disease, with the Gillard government hell-bent on implementing a compulsory income management system.

Schrapel says compulsory income management was a failed system when it was implemented in the Northern Territory, and it failed to address the welfare of children for which it was first designed.

Schrapel described such ‘welfare quarantining’ as fiscally irresponsible and morally indefensible, saying 50 years ago we shifted from a welfare system based around sustenance, to a system focused on the dignity of the recipient. He says compulsory income management undermines this.

These sentiments were echoed by St Vincent de Paul Society's National Council CEO John Falzon who says compulsory income inadequacy, or its accursed cousin compulsory income management, could never address the problem of inequality.

Falzon says instead they do the opposite – they entrench inequality and do not create dignity or liberation for disadvantaged Australians.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at or download our contributor guidelines.


Create a Reconciliation Action Plan/></a></div></div>    </div>





    <div class=


  • Anonymous says:

    I hardly expect you to publish this comment because it presents a counter argument. Yes most people want to work, yes most people are genuinely ill. Both these groups need and should get suport. But what about the percentage that do not want to work, that want to bludge, who have an illness that does allow them to work – we all know of these examples. The moment anyone ever talks about how to address this rorting of the system – they are seen as called mean, extremist etc. I for one am sick of being a PAYG, paying tax at the highest rate with absolutely zero concessions or tax releif, then my own cousin who is one of these bludgers just laughs at me in pity… Most people won't realise that even credit card companies and superannuation funds off an incentive not to work for at least 6 months. For example if I pay 175 bucks a month to American Express, fater six months of continuous unemployment AMex will write off my entire debt – no matter how large it is. If I want to access some of my super funds because I am young and dumb, then after six months on the dole I can. Lets have some serious discuision about this rather than simple knee jerk politically driven noise. I expected more from ACOSS

  • Anonymous says:

    cut politicians benefits and entitlement

  • meg schwarz says:

    I disagree that a strategy of training and education only is needed to get long term unemployed back into the work sector. This wouldn't work unless the desire to learn is also present. I applaud, in part, Mr Abbott's suggestions to get long term unemployed back into the workforce. Many people work in jobs that don't have the full meaning for them and don't always have the luxury to pick and choose at will. It is unfair to suggest that long term unemployed should be offered jobs that are always meaningful for them……how long might that take?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Pro Bono News releases promise tracker for the 2022 federal election

Danielle Kutchel

Wednesday, 18th May 2022 at 4:48 pm

The new normal for a not for profit

Clare Steele

Wednesday, 18th May 2022 at 12:39 pm

Politics needs an overhaul, but not in the way you think

Polly Cameron

Wednesday, 18th May 2022 at 9:57 am

Leigh faces the sector’s concerns

Danielle Kutchel

Monday, 16th May 2022 at 5:11 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook