Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  | 

Tax Ruling Tough on NFPs


23 June 2011 at 4:49 pm
Lina Caneva
A Melbourne taxation expert on Not for Profit issues has warned that the Australian Tax Office has ‘subsidiary entities’ and in particular Not for Profit Clubs clearly in its sights following its latest tax ruling.

Lina Caneva | 23 June 2011 at 4:49 pm


0 Comments


 Print
Tax Ruling Tough on NFPs
23 June 2011 at 4:49 pm

 

A Melbourne taxation expert on Not for Profit issues has warned that the Australian Tax Office has ‘subsidiary entities’ and in particular Not for Profit Clubs clearly in its sights following its latest tax ruling.

Stephen O’Flynn, Tax Director at Moore Stephens Melbourne, says the new tax ruling indicates that the ATO has not rolled over on the Word Investments decision – a decision that means charities can operate businesses while staying tax-exempt, as long as the charitable purpose is the only motive for making profit.

The ATO has released TR 2005/22DA – Taxation Ruling Draft Addendum which includes an Education example and a Club example that O’Flynn says takes a pretty tough and unexpected view of the availability of the income tax exemption, considering the decision in Word Investments.  

O’Flynn says the examples are too simplistic and if anything, are weighted far too heavily in favour of protecting the revenue.

He says the ruling shows the ATO has not rolled over on Word Investments and has the taxation of subsidiary entities and in particular the Not-for-Profit Clubs clearly in its sights.

The Moore Stephens has obtained tax exempt charity concession status for a number of subsidiary entities since the Word Investment Case and believes the new tax ruling takes a tougher view.

O’Flynn says the sector was expecting the ruling to be a lot more concessional.

He says there may be some advantages in NFPs setting up separate entities to protect their assets from commercial risks and this is what a number of organisations currently do.  

He says the decision in Word Investments has made this a viable option for NFPs.  

The previous ATO view was forcing NFPs to carry out commercial activities in the same entity as the entity carrying out their altruistic purposes.  

As well O’Flynn says the 2011/12 Federal Budget heralded wide-sweeping changes to the Not for Profit sector, in particular, the tax changes may be the most significant to the NFP sector since the introduction of GST.  
Certain NFP entities can currently access tax concession including:

  • income tax exemption;
  • FBT exemption or rebate;
  • GST concessions;
  • refundable franking credits for charities and deductible gift recipients.

The main budget announcements were:

  • Establishment of the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits-Commission (ACNC).
  • Better targeting of not-for-profit concessions (e.g. removing the income tax exemptions, FBT exemptions/rebates and GST concessions for the unrelated commercial activities of a NFP).
  • Introduction of a Statutory Definition of Charity.

O’Flynn says the establishment of the ACNC is welcomed as it should stream line the reporting and regulatory process for NFPs.

However, he says as there has been no legislation released there is a lot of uncertainty at the moment regarding how “commercial activities” should be carried out in the NFP space going forward.  

On 27 May 2011 Treasury released a consultation paper on better targeting of NFP tax concessions.

O’Flynn says unfortunately there is little in the paper to please NFP entities, as it foreshadows a significantly increased compliance burden for NFPs that undertake commercial activities, and there is a potential tax burden.  

He says the paper is also disappointing for practitioners, as in many respects it seems to simply adopt the ATO’s positions (e.g. on activities which are ancillary to or incidental to an entity’s charitable purpose).  

He says this may suggest that the ATO is currently driving the reform agenda. It is hoped that going forward Treasury provides the sort of rigorous, independent policy analysis one would expect on such major reforms

To read a detailed opinion on the Budget announcements go to : http://moorestephensresources.com.au/articles/540/1/Not-for-Profit-changes-announced-in-201112-Federal-Budget/Page1.html


Lina Caneva  |  Editor  |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years. She was the editor of Pro Bono Australia News from when it was founded in 2000 until 2018.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

New virtual festival is one of a KIND

Luke Michael

Saturday, 15th August 2020 at 8:00 am

Calls to get more people with disability on the NDIA board

Luke Michael

Friday, 14th August 2020 at 5:39 pm

Poor working Aussies feel uncomfortable seeking charity help

Luke Michael

Friday, 14th August 2020 at 5:27 pm

The six most common mistakes made by new NDIS providers

Faz Mohitian

Thursday, 13th August 2020 at 8:22 am

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×

We need your help.

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, Pro Bono Australia has seen a devastating fall in advertising and less people posting on our job board, which is how we fund our free news service. You can show us that you value the work we do by making a contribution.

 Make a contribution 

You have Successfully Subscribed!