Good 360
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

Government Slammed Over Bill to Expand Welfare Quarantining


Wednesday, 23rd November 2011 at 4:57 pm
Staff Reporter
The Federal Government has introduced legislation to extend ‘welfare quarantining’ - a system introduced under the Howard Government’s highly controversial Northern Territory intervention - but peak welfare Not for Profits want the legislation withdrawn.


Wednesday, 23rd November 2011
at 4:57 pm
Staff Reporter


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Government Slammed Over Bill to Expand Welfare Quarantining
Wednesday, 23rd November 2011 at 4:57 pm
Flickr Image: Some rights reserved by Rusty Stewart 

The Federal Government has introduced legislation to extend ‘welfare quarantining’ – a system introduced under the Howard Government’s highly controversial Northern Territory intervention – but peak welfare Not for Profits want the legislation withdrawn.

Some 26 Aboriginal peak bodies, community welfare and public health groups are calling on the Government to withdraw the income-management legislation and opt for a new direction in policies affecting Australian Aborigines based on cooperation, not ‘intervention'.

The groups say the Government’s own evaluation of the NT Intervention shows that welfare quarantining doesn’t work and has created a feeling of dis-empowerment and loss of community control among aboriginal communinties.

The Stronger Futures Bill, introduced into Parliament by Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin, would see parents forced to attend family conferences and welfare payments suspended if children are regularly absent from school. It would also link alcohol-related criminal offences with income management.

Introducing the Bill into Federal Parliament, Jenny Macklin said the Bill aimed to build a future for Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory “where people live in good houses, and in safe communities. Where parents go to work, and children go to school each day.”

The groups opposing the move – including the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS), the Aboriginal Peak Organisations of the Northern Territory, the Public Health Association of Australia and the Arab Council of Australia – say they support new investment in jobs for Indigenous Territorians, but are concerned about the proposed extension of a program that withdraws social security payments from parents whose children don't attend school regularly.

ACOSS CEO Dr Cassandra Goldie says some aspects of the Government’s announcement – including strategies to generate local jobs – are encouraging.

However, Goldie says “the proposed expansion of the SEAM (The Improving School Enrolment and Attendance through Welfare Reform Measure) program that withdraws income support payments from parents whose children aren't attending school suggests that a punitive, top-down approach to social problems is still being pursued”.

A joint statement from the groups says the strong message from recent consultations with Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory “is that people want reliable services, schools and jobs in their own communities, not that they think simplistic ‘get tough' policies are the answer.”

The groups point to the government’s own evaluation of the Intervention, the Northern Territory Emergency Response Evaluation Report 2011”, which was released this month. The conclusion of the review include the statement:

“The compulsory nature of income management and its blanket imposition (in combination with other changes, such as local government reform, shire amalgamations and losses of local councils; changes to CDEP; the loss of the permit system; and changes in land tenure) are likely to have contributed to people’s feeling of a loss of freedom, empowerment and community control.”

The groups say they share the widely held concerns that too many children are missing out on a good education due to attendance – but policies should be based on what communities and government know actually works on the ground.

The SEAM trials in the NT and Queensland are yet to be evaluated, but the groups say “there is no evidence they have been effective yet the scheme is costing over $200,000 per school per year to administer.”

The groups also point to one of the key findings of the Australian Council for Educational Research’s evaluation of education outcomes under the NTER – which are included in the Government’s own evaluation report – which concluded:

“There has been no observable improvement in school attendance between 2006, before the NTER was introduced, and 2010, the last full year for which data are available.”

"It is deeply disappointing to see the Federal Government aligning itself with policies such as compulsory income management and SEAM,” said John Falzon, CEO of the St Vincent de Paul Society National Council of Australia.

“You don't build people and communities up by attacking their dignity and their right to self-determination”

The groups want the Government to engage with communities and their community organisations and peak bodies on whether they want to replace policies such as SEAM and income management that were imposed on them compulsorily, with voluntary or ‘opt in' income support arrangements and support services tailored to the needs of each community.

The organisations calling on the Government for ‘Cooperation, not Intervention’ include:

ACOSS – Australian Council of Social Service
APO NT – Aboriginal Peak Organisations of the Northern Territory
An alliance comprising the Central Land Council (CLC), Northern Land Council (NLC), Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance of the NT (AMSANT), North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency (NAAJA) and Central Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service (CAALAS).
NTCOSS – Northern Territory Council of Social Service
Tangentyere Council
The Fred Hollows Foundation
AEU NT – Australian Education Union Northern Territory
NT COGSO – Northern Territory Council of Government School Organisations
PHAA – Public Health Association of Australia
St Vincent de Paul Society National Council of Australia
UnitingCare Australia
Catholic Social Services Australia
National Welfare Rights Network
Professor Jon Altman, The Australian National University
Larissa Behrendt, Jumbunna IHL Research Unit
Michele Harris OAM, Concerned Australians
ANTaR – Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation
COSS Network – Councils of Social Service in Victoria (VCOSS) South Australia (SACOSS), Western Australia (WACOSS), NSW (NCOSS), ACT (ACTCOSS) and Tasmania (TasCOSS).
The Aboriginal Medical Service Cooperative Limited, Redfern
Arab Council Australia
Western Sydney Community Forum
TRI Community Exchange
Granville Multicultural Community Centre
 



FEATURED SUPPLIERS


HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....

Moores

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

More Suppliers


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

States Urged to Support Child Sexual Abuse Redress Scheme

Luke Michael

Monday, 30th October 2017 at 4:30 pm

Government Suspends Payments for 1300 Young Job Seekers Not in PaTH Program

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 6th September 2017 at 5:16 pm

Welfare Needs a Radical Restructuring

Eva Cox

Tuesday, 5th September 2017 at 8:58 am

Calls For Overhaul of Welfare System as Talk Turns to UBI

Wendy Williams

Friday, 25th August 2017 at 5:09 pm

POPULAR

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

Disability Advocacy Group Fights to Restore State Funding

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:37 am

Concerns Raised Over New ACNC Board Appointments

Luke Michael

Monday, 20th November 2017 at 2:28 pm

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

One Comment

  • Anonymous Anonymous says:

    It is heartening to see that such a diverse group of organisations have joined together on this issue. I have no doubt that the concern and outrage comes from a frustration about how to raise health, education and personal safely levels for people in small, remote communities. These problems are real and inflict a level of misery on certain people in communities, and without education and services, there is little hope. For some well meaning people, turning back the clock 200 years is an unrealisable aspiration. For others, 'doing something' is better than doing nothing. What is clear is that the government is seeking to do something. It may not be what the signatories agree with, but it is not clear what they propose as a realistic alternative. As with the OccupyWallSt demonstrations, its easy to say what we dont like, but its another thing to be part of the solution. The signatories might not like what the government is doing, and they dont seem to propose practical alternatives to get kids to school, to protect families from drink-fuelled violence, or poverty, but they truly cant criticise the government's intention to do something that will help… Intention and action count for a lot, especially compared with "We Just Dont Like It".

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Good 360
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

The social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!