Good 360
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Corporate Engagement, Good Business

Corporate Social Responsibility: Fatally Compromised


Wednesday, 30th July 2014 at 2:14 am
Lina Caneva, Editor
Corporate social responsibility is fatally compromised and, in the hands of multinational corporations, often does more harm than good, according to a prominent business ethicist.

Wednesday, 30th July 2014
at 2:14 am
Lina Caneva, Editor


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Corporate Social Responsibility: Fatally Compromised
Wednesday, 30th July 2014 at 2:14 am

Corporate social responsibility is fatally compromised and, in the hands of multinational corporations, often does more harm than good, according to a prominent business ethicist.

Speaking on Melbourne University radio program Up Close, Professor Peter Fleming told presenter Elisabeth Lopez that CSR was merely “a good excuse for business as usual”.

“We would argue that with the rise of corporate social responsibility we would see it more as an excuse to carry on as a for profit unregulated some would say, rather profiteering approach to their business rather than having other stakeholders have a genuine say in the way in which business is organised in society," Fleming said.  

“From its beginning, CSR as a practice and as a theory has had a kind of an inbuilt cynicism in which it's not really supposed to be taken too seriously.  In other words, ‘oh yeah, let's have some corporate social responsibility, but only up to the point where it makes us money and when it stops you know that's when we've got to be a little bit more flexible about how we use it'."  

Fleming,  a Professor of Business in Society at Cass Business School at City University, London, said increased prominence of CSR could be attributed to a growing need for businesses to prove themselves responsible.

“…I would argue that the rise of CSR in even some of the most controversial industries like the mining industry for example, is probably more of the result of a deep legitimacy crisis facing business today,” Fleming said.  

“It seems to be this kind of recurring sense that organisations are breaking the rules, are really kind of trying to maximise profits at whatever cost and I think with the financial crisis – the global financial crisis, that's really been emphasised in people's imaginations.”

Fleming said that if CSR were to be taken seriously by corporations there could be “a whole paradigm shift in the way in which business is done”, but that problems arose because such a transformation would be at odds, however, to capitalist systems of wealth maximisation.  

“…we would argue that if we really took corporate social responsibility seriously and actually integrated it into every part of the business, we would see some major transformations,” he said.  

“We can abandon the very idea of ethics in the face of the realisation I've just stated, which I would not recommend at all. Or we could start to modify the very economic paradigm that we work in to become at least possibly more aligned to some of the ethical ideals that all of us hold on to.  

“It would need a culture change in the organisation in question.  That would be very, very important rather than seeing the organisation simply as a vehicle for private extreme wealth/gain.”

Fleming said consumer pressure was limited in the amount of change it could achieve.

“I think consumer activism is important but it's probably not the only thing we would want to rely upon to try and make a difference in the way in which some of these organisations operate,” he said.  

“One of the important assumptions of corporate social responsibility is that if we make our products more ethically friendly, then we can sell more stuff.  

“The problem or the contradiction here is that selling more stuff regardless of whether it has a green label on it or not, breeds a mentality that is linked to some of the problems that we're facing now in the global system, in which ramping consumerism is unsustainable and has spillover effects in all sorts of quarters of society that we would consider to be rather problematic.”

Fleming discussed his views in the context of his 2013 book, The End of Corporate Social Responsibility.

Listen to the full program here.


Lina Caneva  |  Editor |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years, and Editor of Pro Bono Australia News since it was founded in 2000.

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

...


More Suppliers


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Five Ways The Future of Work Could Change For Women

Victoria George

Friday, 27th October 2017 at 4:13 pm

Warning to CEOs – CSR May Get You Fired, Study Finds

Lina Caneva

Tuesday, 24th October 2017 at 10:07 am

Philanthropic Donation Looks To Emerging Field of ‘Personalised Medicine’

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 18th October 2017 at 3:33 pm

LEGO Comes Top For CSR

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 4th October 2017 at 8:57 am

POPULAR

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

Concerns Raised Over New ACNC Board Appointments

Luke Michael

Monday, 20th November 2017 at 2:28 pm

Disability Advocacy Group Fights to Restore State Funding

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:37 am

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Good 360
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

The social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!