Guide to Giving
NEWS  |  General, Research

Attractive Women Better Fundraisers – Report

Tuesday, 21st April 2015 at 11:23 am
Lina Caneva, Editor
You have a better chance of raising money for a worthy cause if you are an attractive woman, according to new research by two UK universities.

Tuesday, 21st April 2015
at 11:23 am
Lina Caneva, Editor



Attractive Women Better Fundraisers – Report
Tuesday, 21st April 2015 at 11:23 am

You have a better chance of raising money for a worthy cause if you are an attractive woman, according to new research by two UK universities.

The research, by University College London (UCL) and the University of Bristol, found that men are competitive in their donating, giving more money through fundraising websites after seeing that other men have donated large amounts and when the fundraiser is an attractive member of the opposite sex.

The scientists behind the research said this response was unlikely to be conscious and could have an evolutionary function as some theories predict that generous actions can honestly signal hidden qualities, such as wealth or desirable personality attributes, to potential partners.

Co-author of the report, Competitive Helping in Online Giving, Dr Nichola Raihani from UCL said 2,561 fundraising pages from the 2014 London Marathon were reviewed with 668 being researched in depth because they met the study criteria.

“We looked at why people behave generously in real-world situations, even when there is no obvious benefit to them in doing so,” Dr Raihani said.

“We found a remarkably strong response with men competing to advertise generosity to attractive women, but didn’t see women reacting in a similar way, showing that competitive helping is more a male than female trait.”

The study, published today in Current Biology and funded by the Royal Society, found that people on average give about £10 more after seeing others’ large donations. When the large donations are made by men to attractive female fundraisers, subsequent donations from other men increase by a further £28 on average.

For each fundraising page studied, the researchers calculated the average donation using up to 10 donations before a large sum was given. The responses of up to 15 donors following the large donation were then studied in 12 categories defined by the gender and attractiveness of the fundraiser, and the gender of the person who made the large donation.

Each fundraising page was shown to four independent reviewers who rated how attractive they found the fundraiser on a scale of 0-10 with 10 being ‘extremely attractive’. For both men and women, fundraisers who were smiling were perceived to be more attractive than those who weren’t and received more donations.

Co-author of the report, Professor Sarah Smith from the University of Bristol, said the results of the research could have practical implications for fundraisers.

“Fundraising pages provide a fascinating real-life laboratory for looking at charity donations. Previously, we saw how donors responded to how much other people had given. Now we see that the response depends – albeit sub-consciously – on the fundraiser’s attractiveness,” Professor Smith said.

“On a practical level, there are implications for how fundraisers can raise more money for charities. To London marathon fundraisers, I would say get your generous friends to donate early and make sure you put a good picture up, preferably one in which you are smiling.”

Dr Raihani added that it was "fascinating that evolutionary biology can offer insights into human behaviour even in the modern world”.

“People are really generous and their reasons for giving to charity are generally not self-serving but it doesn’t preclude their motives from having evolved to benefit them in some way.

“Take eating for example, our primary drive is to dispel the feeling of hunger, which is pleasurable, but the evolutionary purpose is to make sure we don’t starve and die. Generous behaviours can be seen in a similar way – the motivation for performing them doesn’t have to be the same as the evolutionary function.”

Lina Caneva  |  Editor |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years, and Editor of Pro Bono Australia News since it was founded in 2000.

Guide to Giving


Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....


Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT


Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this



NFPs Driving WA Economy, Report Says

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 15th February 2017 at 4:20 pm

Study into the Effect of the NDIS on Carers

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 25th January 2017 at 9:26 am

Survey Reveals Australian Attitudes to Torture in Conflict

Lina Caneva

Tuesday, 6th December 2016 at 3:05 pm

Indigenous Advocate Named 2016 Telstra Business Woman of the Year

Lina Caneva

Tuesday, 22nd November 2016 at 12:30 pm


Moves to Stop Volunteering at Overseas Orphanages

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 1:54 pm

Future Uncertain for Disability Organisations Following Funding Cuts

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:29 am

Majority of NFPs Are Not Believed to be Well-Run, According to New Survey

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 12th September 2017 at 4:14 pm

More Australians Are Giving Time Not Money

Wendy Williams

Monday, 11th September 2017 at 5:07 pm

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guide to Giving
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!