NDIS Criterion
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  | 

Sector Call on Amendments to Private & Public Ancillary Funds


Tuesday, 19th January 2016 at 10:51 am
Lina Caneva, Editor
The Community Council for Australia is calling on the Not for Profit sector to provide feedback on critical changes to the private and public ancillary fund guidelines being proposed by the Federal Government.

Tuesday, 19th January 2016
at 10:51 am
Lina Caneva, Editor


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Sector Call on Amendments to Private & Public Ancillary Funds
Tuesday, 19th January 2016 at 10:51 am

The Community Council for Australia is calling on the Not for Profit sector to provide feedback on critical changes to the private and public ancillary fund guidelines being proposed by the Federal Government.

The Federal Treasury is consulting on draft amendments to the private ancillary fund (PAF) and public ancillary fund (PuAF) guidelines and CCA said it has been asked to provide a submission.

CCA CEO, David Crosbie, said while his organisation welcomed many of the proposed changes, particularly those reflecting the role of the the charity regulator, the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC), there remained the critical issue around changes to annual distribution rates for private and public ancillary funds.

According to the consultation information provided by the Treasury “of particular significance is the proposed change to the minimum distribution requirement”.

The draft amendments would remove the current minimum distribution requirement of 5 per cent (for a PAF) and 4 per cent (for a PuAF) of the market value of the fund's net assets as valued at the end of the previous financial year.

The draft said this would be replaced by a minimum distribution requirement which would be calculated using either the average of the Reserve Bank of Australia’s target for the cash rate over the previous financial year (expressed as a percentage), or the fund’s net investment earnings or returns (according to accounting concepts) for the previous financial year less any reasonable expenses.

“As the Reserve Bank of Australia’s target for the cash rate has been at 2 per cent since the beginning of the current financial year, the proposed change would mean that the minimum distribution requirement for the financial year commencing in July 2016 would drop significantly,” the Treasury said.

Crosbie said PAFs and PuAFs are set up as a vehicle to provide funding to eligible charities.  

“It is the fastest growing way for people to establish their own charitable foundations and currently distributes significant amounts of funding to charities in Australia. The 5 per cent PAF and 4 per cent PuAF rule ensures all PAFs and PuAFs meet their charitable obligation,” Crosbie said.

However, he said there were two opposing schools of thought about these proposed changes.

“One position is that this proposed change reflects the reality of lower returns for foundations (PAFs and PuAFs) on their investments. If foundations are forced to distribute more than they earn on their investments by having to distribute 5 per cent each year, it may eat into the principle amount and the quality and effectiveness in administration of grants etc. If the principle is diminished it means lower payouts in the future and less money to the sector. Providing this leeway in terms of how much is redistributed to the sector may actually mean more will be distributed in the long term,” Crosbie said.

“An opposing view is that if PAFs and PuAFs are to meet their charitable purpose, they need to show they are distributing a reasonable amount each year to fulfilling their primary role – providing funding to eligible charities.  

“Equities and other markets will fluctuate and there may be times when foundations may need to use the principle to meet their charitable obligations. Over time, 5 per cent seems a reasonable return and is a fair minimum.   

“Allowing much smaller levels of payments to charities (as reflected in the Reserve Bank cash rate) may enable foundations to spend a lot more on administration and other internal costs, and distribute less to eligible charities.”

Crosbie said CCA understood and accepted there was some legitimacy to each argument and, for this reason, was consulting with the sector and some foundations and others directly impacted by these changes.

“Our current view is that the method of calculating the amount to be paid under the (status quo) may be reasonable, but the first (the Reserve Bank cash rate) seems to set the bar too low,” he said.

CCA members can provide feedback to leighw@communitycouncil.com.au.

Individual submissions can be made here.


Lina Caneva  |  Editor |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years, and Editor of Pro Bono Australia News since it was founded in 2000.

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

...


NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

Nightmares and Good Policy

David Crosbie

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:29 am

Fears For International Philanthropy Rise as Foreign Donations Bill Looms

Wendy Williams

Monday, 6th November 2017 at 5:27 pm

Shifting the Dial: From Profits and Process to Community Building

David Crosbie

Thursday, 26th October 2017 at 8:30 am

POPULAR

Disability Advocacy Group Fights to Restore State Funding

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:37 am

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

Donors Looking for a Personalised Experience to Give More – Study

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 8th November 2017 at 1:43 pm

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


NDIS Criterion
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

The social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!