subscribe to careers
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  |  Policy

Community Sector Hits Back at Climate Solutions Fund


Wednesday, 27th February 2019 at 5:01 pm
Maggie Coggan
The government’s rebadging of Tony Abbott’s emissions reduction fund as a “Climate Solutions Fund” has been slammed by community groups, who say it will be ineffective in solving the real problems causing climate change.


Wednesday, 27th February 2019
at 5:01 pm
Maggie Coggan


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Community Sector Hits Back at Climate Solutions Fund
Wednesday, 27th February 2019 at 5:01 pm

The government’s rebadging of Tony Abbott’s emissions reduction fund as a “Climate Solutions Fund” has been slammed by community groups, who say it will be ineffective in solving the real problems causing climate change.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced the package on Monday, and said it would build on Abbott’s highly criticised ERF which pays farmers and business to reduce carbon emissions.

Morrison said the solutions fund would continue to partner with farmers, business and Indigenous communities to help them reduce their emissions via reforestation, waste management solutions, and land care programs.

But the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) said a new name for the ERF wouldn’t answer questions about the governance, effectiveness or value for money the fund previously raised.  

“Since coming to office in September 2013 the Coalition has made no progress in reducing Australia’s overall emissions, despite having the Emissions Reduction Fund, so it’s hard to see how continuing with the same methods will lead to a different result,” Gavin McFadzean, ACF climate change and clean energy program manager, said.

He said while the ERF could encourage farmers to protect native forests and restore vegetation, it did not divert the electricity sector away from non-renewable energy sources.

“It does nothing to move the electricity sector away from burning coal and gas, so is not suitable to be Australia’s primary mechanism for tackling climate change,” he said.

Cassandra Goldie, ACOSS CEO, noted that the climate package did little to solve climate change, or support people on low incomes, who could not afford clean energy solutions like solar panels.  

“The Coalition has not increased its woefully inadequate 2030 emissions reduction targets, or outlined a plan to transition equitably to clean energy with protections for people on low-incomes,” Goldie said.

“The biggest opportunities that will make the biggest difference to people and emissions have been overlooked.”

Nicky Ison, director of the Community Power Agency, told Pro Bono News that given the government’s track record of climate inaction and attempting to cut billions of dollars from projects such as the Renewable Energy Agency, it was difficult to believe they had had a change of heart on the issue.

“This is a government that has been in for six years and not only has it done nothing to act on climate, they have done their best to undermine climate action by cutting the Renewable Energy Target and any national scheme to replace it,” Ison said.

“Their flagship policy has been the ERF but it doesn’t work because it calls for abatement, and a payment for abatement but not in the electricity sector.”

She said if the government was serious about acting on climate change, it would put in place a framework for the electricity sector to decarbonise, and impose penalties for not following through with agreed targets.  

“If our largest polluters continue to float we need more research and funding into new technologies that help decarbonise our industrial and agricultural sector,” she said.  

“And instead of paying people to plant trees, put in place penalties for deforestation.”  

She encouraged the sector and the public to push for effective policies, and talk with their vote card at the upcoming federal election.

“For organisations who care about the future of our environment, and the future of people in low income households, I would be advocating that when they vote, they consider voting for a party that takes climate change seriously,” she said.  


Maggie Coggan  |  Journalist  |  @MaggieCoggan

Maggie Coggan is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.


Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au


Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Community sector struggling to meet demand

Maggie Coggan

Monday, 20th January 2020 at 5:23 pm

Native Americans hold US government to account on climate change

Luke Michael

Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 4:15 pm

Fears welfare card holders could be left high and dry in bushfires

Maggie Coggan

Monday, 13th January 2020 at 4:41 pm

ACOSS fears $550M community services funding cut will hurt vulnerable people

Luke Michael

Monday, 16th December 2019 at 4:36 pm

POPULAR

How are Aussie charities helping in the bushfire crisis?

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th January 2020 at 3:21 pm

What impact will the bushfire crisis have on homelessness?

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:28 pm

The rise (and scepticism) of Facebook fundraisers

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 8:49 am

Bushfire resources for people with disability

Contributor

Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:54 pm

subscribe to careers
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!