subscribe to careers
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
Around the World  |  Philanthropy

NFPs Rethink Opioid Flushed Gifts


Monday, 25th February 2019 at 4:53 pm
Maggie Coggan
A growing list of universities, museums and not for profits around the world are reviewing their philanthropic relationship with members of the Sackler family over their role in marketing the controversial pain-pill, OxyContin.


Monday, 25th February 2019
at 4:53 pm
Maggie Coggan


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
NFPs Rethink Opioid Flushed Gifts
Monday, 25th February 2019 at 4:53 pm

A growing list of universities, museums and not for profits around the world are reviewing their philanthropic relationship with members of the Sackler family over their role in marketing the controversial pain-pill, OxyContin.

The Sackler-owned pharmaceutical giant, Purdue Pharma, has been under renewed scrutiny since January over allegedly contributing to the opioid epidemic via aggressive marketing techniques of the drug OxyContin, and concealing the strength of the drug from doctors.     

According to reports by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), The New York Academy of Sciences, which hosts the Sackler Institute for Nutrition Science, and Columbia University, which received funding from the family for a professorship, awards and an institute in its psychiatry department, are the latest institutions to reconsider their philanthropic relationships.

Activists have been mounting pressure on other institutions to stop accepting philanthropic donations from the family.

In early January, the Sackler Centre for Arts Education, which sits in the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York, was stormed by anti-opioid group, Prescription Addiction Intervention Now.

Similar protests were held at Harvard, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, and the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C, which have all received philanthropic funding from members of the family.

A spokesperson from Purdue Pharma said the donations were not funded by the sale or distribution of OxyContin, its most successful product.

“Many leading medical, scientific, cultural, and educational institutions throughout the world have been beneficiaries of Sackler family philanthropy for nearly seven decades, including long before OxyContin was approved by the FDA in December 1995,” the spokesperson said.  

Either there are no banners, they are disabled or none qualified for this location!

“Since that approval, OxyContin has been and continues to be appropriately prescribed by doctors to bring needed relief to thousands suffering from severe pain, including those with cancer and terminal illnesses.”

The exact figure of philanthropic gifts from the family has not been made public but according to the WSJ, from 2015 to 2017, the Mortimer D. Sackler foundation handed out more than US$2.7 million (A$3.7 million), while London-based Sackler Trust donated UK£8.4 million (A$15.4) in 2017.

Philanthropy and NFP experts told WSJ removing the Sackler name from buildings, awards or scholarships could be difficult, and dependant on the nature of the contract that often accompanies large gifts.

Sarah Davies, CEO of Philanthropy Australia, told Pro Bono News deciding which donors to accept money from required strict governance.

“It’s a difficult issue and charities need to consider and define what this means and looks like for them from a governance perspective, and how this then folds into policies about who they will partner with and who they will accept donations from,” Davies said.   

“Some may take the broadest definition ‘if it’s legal, we will accept it’. Others will choose to take a tightly aligned approach or overlay an ethical framework that considers purpose, values and culture to determine fit.”   

She said it was a serious matter not only for boards and leaders to determine what was best for them in achieving their purpose against their values, but for potential donors as well when they were considering who they wanted to support.

She said the key was for organisations and donors to be transparent in their practices.

“Being open about where you land is important – this clarity and transparency will help connect natural partners and set relevant expectations,” she said.


Maggie Coggan  |  Journalist  |  @MaggieCoggan

Maggie Coggan is a journalist at Pro Bono News covering the social sector.


Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Philanthropic giant steps up for bushfire crisis

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 9th January 2020 at 3:15 pm

Top philanthropic gifts of 2019

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 18th December 2019 at 5:33 pm

Participatory grantmaking: Can we afford not to do it?

Contributor

Monday, 16th December 2019 at 4:17 pm

A champion of profit and purpose

Maggie Coggan

Monday, 16th December 2019 at 8:21 am

POPULAR

How are Aussie charities helping in the bushfire crisis?

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 7th January 2020 at 3:21 pm

What impact will the bushfire crisis have on homelessness?

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 15th January 2020 at 4:28 pm

The rise (and scepticism) of Facebook fundraisers

Maggie Coggan

Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 8:49 am

What about the charities?

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 8th January 2020 at 1:26 pm

subscribe to careers
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!