Close Search
Opinion  |  GovernanceMisconduct

Culture is the root of misconduct – here’s how the NFP sector should respond

19 June 2020 at 2:44 pm
Vera Visevic
The recent string of royal commissions into institutional misconduct have highlighted the need for a new customer-centric approach in the NFP sector, writes Vera Visevic. 

Vera Visevic | 19 June 2020 at 2:44 pm


Culture is the root of misconduct – here’s how the NFP sector should respond
19 June 2020 at 2:44 pm

The recent string of royal commissions into institutional misconduct have highlighted the need for a new customer-centric approach in the NFP sector, writes Vera Visevic. 

The past four years have seen four royal commissions into institutional misconduct. What was unearthed at those commissions shocked the public and undermined confidence in a number of our key institutions. The NFP sector needs to heed the lessons of those enquiries and find a new path forward, putting culture and customer at the core of everything we do. 

That’s the common theme which emerges from all four enquiries – the Child Sexual Abuse Royal Commission (2017), the Banking Royal Commission (2019), the Aged Care Royal Commission (2019) and the Disability Royal Commission (2020). The lesson which stands out from all of these enquiries is a simple one: culture is the root of misconduct. 

One aspect of institutional culture came in for particular scrutiny: the prioritisation of organisational interest over the interests of the customer. This culture was characterised by the making of decisions from both senior and front-line decision-makers which ignored proper governance standards, suppressed complaints and incentivised self-interested behaviour. 

Within the NFP sector, it is easy to understand the origins of this slippery slope. NFPs often face the tricky task of maximising their limited resources to reach their beneficiaries whilst simultaneously reinvesting funds into the growth of their organisations. 

Because many NFPs concentrate their efforts on their operational purpose (applying funds to beneficiaries), attending to the culture of their organisation and governance of their systems, procedures, employees, management and volunteers is given scant critical regard or may even be overlooked altogether. 

The recent royal commissions should therefore serve as a warning and a reminder to NFPs of the heightened risk to their reputations and to the beneficiaries they serve, if they ignore their own culture and governance. It is time for a new, customer-centric approach to come to the fore. 

Customer-centricity involves shifting the lens through which the organisation is understood. The “customer” for every organisation is different. Whilst the “customer” is often defined as the recipient of the service that an organisation provides, this is not always necessarily the case. It could be other key stakeholders that the organisation is established to benefit, such as funders, paying customers, members or beneficiaries. 

Instead of viewing the organisation through the lens of the goods or services it provides, a customer-centric model shifts this focal point to identifying the organisation’s target customers, and the problem the organisation is seeking to solve for them. It involves taking the customer perspective into the very architecture of an organisation, such as the organisation’s constitution, governance structures and remuneration models. 

For an NFP, the objects, purposes, mission and values of an organisation should be customer-centric and be demonstrated throughout its key documents and in internal cultural rhetoric. This means that every organisation should have an effective constitution. It should 

have effective systems for risk management, complaints handling, and defensible records handling. 

NFPs must actively hold their senior management to such standards, and be quick to implement practical measures. This can be done by using remuneration packages to incentivise risk compliance and robust governance structures, or by disciplinary mechanisms such as removing board members if they do not meet the legal and ethical standards that their beneficiaries and contributors expect of them. 

Above all, organisational reputation must be secondary to care and justice for the beneficiary, and this must be reflected in how decisions are made. This is the core of a new customer-centric model which will transform the culture of NFP institutions. 


Further commentary on the implications of recent royal commissions for the NFP sector can be found in Visevic’s White Paper on the topic which can be accessed here

Vera Visevic  |  @ProBonoNews

Vera Visevic is an expert in not-for-profit and social enterprise law at Mills Oakley.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at or download our contributor guidelines.


2022 Salary Survey

Get more stories like this


Your email address will not be published.


Guide Dogs Victoria CEO resigns

Danielle Kutchel

Wednesday, 1st June 2022 at 12:04 pm

Beyond the blind eye

David Crosbie

Thursday, 2nd December 2021 at 8:48 am

Australian charities need to get better at mitigating fraud risks

Carol Chris

Wednesday, 20th October 2021 at 5:15 pm

ACNC strips charity status from hundreds of organisations

Luke Michael

Thursday, 19th November 2020 at 4:39 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

News for those with purpose.

Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning. 

Thank you - you have successfully subscribed.

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!