Close Search
Opinion  |  Social IssuesDisability

Women make up half the disability population but just over a third of NDIS recipients

2 February 2022 at 4:55 pm
To better understand what’s behind the disparity, Sophie Yates, Eleanor Malbon, Gemma Carey and Jen Hargrave interviewed 30 women about their experiences with the NDIS. Here they share their findings.

Contributor | 2 February 2022 at 4:55 pm


Women make up half the disability population but just over a third of NDIS recipients
2 February 2022 at 4:55 pm

To better understand what’s behind the disparity, Sophie Yates, Eleanor Malbon, Gemma Carey and Jen Hargrave interviewed 30 women about their experiences with the NDIS. Here they share their findings.

Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) provides individualised funding to nearly 500,000 Australians with disability.

Despite an even male-female split among under-65s with a disability (49 per cent female), only 37 per cent of NDIS participants are women and girls.

To better understand what’s behind the disparity, we interviewed 30 women about their experiences with the NDIS.

The thing that struck us the most was how many women talked about what hard work it was being on the NDIS, or applying for it. Three women told us it was like “a full time job”.

We already knew the NDIS was very administratively complex, and increasingly people have needed to appeal their budgets to get the right supports.

So we started thinking about “administrative burden”, or load, and how it fits into the story of women’s experiences with the NDIS.

What is administrative burden?

Administrative burden is the work people have to do when they access government programs. This can manifest as:

  • learning costs (how hard it is to learn how to apply for and use a program);
  • psychological costs (how emotionally draining or confronting it is); and
  • compliance costs (how difficult it is to comply with program rules and requirements).

Research has increasingly explored how administrative burden falls unevenly on different groups, finding those with the least resources have the largest administrative burden. This includes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people with disability, people with lower socioeconomic status, and people from non-English speaking backgrounds.

These groups are more likely to be gatekept from government programs because of how difficult it is to access and manage them.

Time consuming and difficult

Some women we interviewed experienced a smooth, supportive NDIS experience. However, this wasn’t the norm.

Women told us being on the NDIS took a lot of time and effort. They said communicating with the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) was difficult, and the application process was challenging and emotionally draining.

Interviewee January said it was impossible to phone or contact any specific person:

“The NDIA is like dealing with… you know those octopuses that live a thousand metres down in the ocean, and no one’s ever seen them? So we don’t actually know how they work, just every so often they’ll put a little piece of themselves above the surface and like, wreck a ship. But then you don’t know which animal it’s attached to and you’ve got no way of contacting it, to try and do peace talks. … So it just seems like this faceless monster.”

Administrative burden can be gendered

Although all people accessing and applying for the NDIS (and their families and carers) face administrative burden, our results show this can manifest in gendered ways.

While men and women experience disability at similar rates, men are more likely to be diagnosed with disabilities that are more straightforward to gain access to the NDIS for.

Autism, for example, is male-dominated and comprises about a third of the scheme (although this may reflect gender bias in diagnosis rather than true prevalence).

Women are more likely to be diagnosed with disabilities that don’t fit as well within the medicalised model of disability that has taken over the NDIS. One analysis, for example, found “painful and socially disabling disorders” such as arthritis, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome are more common in women – but it’s difficult to get support for these conditions.

Support needs are supposed to be assessed according to the person’s level of functioning, but applicants are required to provide extensive medical evidence. This means it is more administratively burdensome to apply for support for those disabilities, and women may not be willing to expend so much effort for such an uncertain outcome.

A new analysis of the NDIS application form shows it is long and complicated, partly because it makes assumptions about people’s lives being relatively straightforward. Seemingly simple questions like “does the person require assistance with self-management because of their disability?” can be difficult to answer if you have fluctuating support needs, as is often the case with disabilities more common in women.

Women have less time to manage their own disabilities

Another gendered dimension is that balancing administrative labour and family care is often harder for women, who shoulder more of the caring work.

Women represent over 70 per cent of primary carers to people with disability and older people. Of those providing primary care to children with disability, nearly 90 per cent are female. And 35 per cent of female primary carers have a disability themselves.

Women also tend to take on more of the administrative work of the family, which includes managing the government-related administration of family members.

This leaves them less time to manage their own disabilities.

Some of the women we talked to said it was sometimes too hard to balance self-care, life responsibilities, and fighting for what they needed on the NDIS.

Peta, a mother of young children, told us:

“I called the NDIS the other day and said I just need some more therapy… She listed this litany of things you had to do. I was like, so I’ll just add that to the list of death by admin tasks. And I said, thanks but no thanks, I’ll just pay for it myself. And I just hung up.”

While Peta could luckily afford to pay for the support herself, many women on the NDIS are not in a similar position.

Women with disability are less likely to be in paid work than men with disability, and more economically disadvantaged overall, so if they give up on accessing a support because it’s too hard, they are more likely to just go without.

This was not the first work to examine the administrative burden of the NDIS, but it was the first to do so through a gendered lens. We need more evidence on the nature of administrative barriers for women in the NDIS and what can be done to address them.

The NDIA should also develop and implement an NDIS gender strategy, in partnership with women’s disability organisations.

The Conversation

About the authors: Sophie Yates is a research fellow at UNSW.

Eleanor Malbon is a research fellow at UNSW.

Gemma Carey is associate professor at UNSW.

Jen Hargrave is from The University of Melbourne.


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Get more stories like this



  • MichaelGli says:

    Theories of gender bias have from the start assumed that bias reflected the male hegemony. This example of gender bias is delivered by an ovehelmingly female bureaucracy, right through to the Minister. To progress gender equality further we need to abandon us-them, zero-sum thinking and acknowledge that social and organisational systems coerce men as well as women, to their detriment. Women cop more active suffering, but men and women both miss out on what could be better lives. In the long term men are hurt by gender bias even when it favours them and the cost far exceeds the benefit. Cooperation rather than competition will deliver the best result.

  • MichaelGli says:

    This is a great article. I believe also that the impact of gender on NDIS outcomes is unevenly distributed: it’s biggest impact is on people who are close to the cut-off point, what we might call the grey area of eligibility. Males in this area do much better than females. Gender has much less impact on the extremely disabled. I predict that a re-analysis of recipients by gender that looked only at people receiving lower levels of support would reveal higher gender bias.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More than just mats: opening the beach to people with disability

Danielle Kutchel

Monday, 27th March 2023 at 4:13 pm

Moving towards cultural safety for Aboriginal children with disability

Danielle Kutchel

Monday, 27th March 2023 at 1:47 pm

Disabled workers face systemic barriers at work: report

Danielle Kutchel

Wednesday, 22nd March 2023 at 9:57 am

Lived experience is key in mental health reform

Katie Larsen

Tuesday, 14th March 2023 at 9:01 am

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook