Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  |  Policy

Salvos Clarify Position on Mandatory Pre-Commitment on Poker Machines


1 September 2011 at 1:33 pm
Staff Reporter
The Salvation Army has been forced to clarify its position on mandatory pre-commitment on poker machines after reports the welfare organisation had back-flipped on it’s support for the concept.

Staff Reporter | 1 September 2011 at 1:33 pm


2 Comments


 Print
Salvos Clarify Position on Mandatory Pre-Commitment on Poker Machines
1 September 2011 at 1:33 pm

The Salvation Army has been forced to clarify its position on mandatory pre-commitment on poker machines after reports the welfare organisation had back-flipped on it’s support for the concept.

It was suggested in media reports that the Salvos may lose access to fundraising at pubs and clubs if it continued to support pre-Commitment regulations.

However, the Salvation Army has released a statement saying it has not back flipped or changed its position on mandatory pre-commitment.

It says the Salvation Army has held the same position since the beginning of the debate over mandatory pre-commitment and at no time has the Salvation Army ”rejected" mandatory pre-commitment or criticised the motivations or positive intentions of those who support its introduction.

The statement says the Salvation Army has always been opposed to the proliferation of gambling and sought to assist those whose lives have been negatively affected by it.

It says that for this reason the Salvation Army Southern Territory (Vic, TAS, SA, WA, NT) has supported the introduction of mandatory pre-commitment since its announcement.

The Salvation Army Eastern Territory (NSW, ACT, Qld) shares a similar concern for the impact of gambling, however based on consultations with its front line staff, people in its programs effected by problem gambling, and researchers, the Salvation Army Eastern Territory support further trials of mandatory pre-commitment before fully endorsing it.

The Salvation Army says it values its access to the clubs and hotels but any threat to this access was not a factor in determining the position of The Salvation Army Eastern Territory.

The Salvos had joined a campaign led by anti-pokies MPs Nick Xenophon and Andrew Wilkie, alongside the Reverend Tim Costello and other church groups in their support of the pre-commitment regulations.

The Federal Government’s proposed gambling reforms are based on the recommendations of the Productivity Commission, including the implementation of a pre-commitment scheme for poker machines to commence in 2012.

In a full pre-commitment scheme, poker machine players will be asked to set a limit on how much money (and possibly time) they want to spend on the pokies in a set period. Players would still have control over their own money and can set the limit as high or low as they like. They could also change their limits but would not be able to revoke or increase them within their agreed set period. In the model recommended by the Productivity Commission, players can choose not to set a limit at all if this is their preference. 



PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Advertisement

CFRE

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

One comment

  • Avatar Cat123 says:

    This ongoing inquisition just to give consumers some protection highlights the double standards that exist in relation to this issue. It seems that some are quite OK about how the public have been used as more or less guinea pigs for whatever this industry has dreamt up in the design of these machines. I mean to say, in relation to consumer harm has there ever been this kind of extensive questioning or demand for 'trials' and evidence before they let loose on the public these ever evolving machines? Strange how when it comes to consumer protection industry apologists act as if it were their inalienable right to involve all and sundry and to demand strong evidence before they will even think about giving their support. I just hope Salvation Army Eastern are consistent and will insist on the same standard of evidence concerning the potential for harm with any further change in game design. I am not at all against having evidence for these reforms; I am just against double standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Election mania: What should I do during caretaker?

Neil Pharaoh

Monday, 21st September 2020 at 4:24 pm

Close to 150,000 jobs at risk due to welfare cuts

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 15th September 2020 at 5:02 pm

JobSeeker recipients fear push back under poverty line

Maggie Coggan

Friday, 11th September 2020 at 4:51 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×

We need your help.

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, Pro Bono Australia has seen a devastating fall in advertising and less people posting on our job board, which is how we fund our free news service. You can show us that you value the work we do by making a contribution.

 Make a contribution 

You have Successfully Subscribed!