Guide to Giving
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  General, Research

Charity Impact Measurement Still Needs Work – Study


Thursday, 18th October 2012 at 10:08 am
Staff Reporter
Only 5% of UK charities say that wanting to improve their services is a primary motivation for increasing their impact measurement efforts and 25% of charities still don’t measure their work at all, according to new research.


Thursday, 18th October 2012
at 10:08 am
Staff Reporter


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Charity Impact Measurement Still Needs Work – Study
Thursday, 18th October 2012 at 10:08 am

A new study has revealed 25% of UK charities don't measure their work. Photo: capreform.eu

Only 5% of UK charities say that wanting to improve their services is a primary motivation for increasing their impact measurement efforts and 25% of charities still don’t measure their work at all, according to new research.

And Australian researchers say while there is an upward trend in the interest in measuring impact here, much more work needs to be done.

The UK charity think tank and consultancy, New Philanthropy Capital has released what it describes as the first representative study of impact measurement amongst UK charities called MAKING AN IMPACT Impact measurement among charities and social enterprises.

It surveyed 1,000 charities with incomes over £10,000 to understand what has changed in charities’ impact measurement practices, the drivers behind measuring impact, and the benefits and challenges that it brings.

Some 75% of charities say they measure the impact of their work and nearly three quarters (74%) of these have invested more in measuring results over the last five years.

The report finds that over half of respondents (52%) measuring impact say they have increased their measurement efforts in order to meet funder requirements. However, only one in twenty (5%) say that service improvement is their main motivation.

“Yet one in four (25%) report improved services as the main perceived benefit of impact measurement,” the Chief Executive of NPC, Dan Corry said.

“The discrepancies between what motivates charities to measure impact and what they get from impact measurement reflects the widespread anecdotal evidence NPC has collected. Whilst charities might be initially reluctant to engage in impact measurement, they go on to find that they reap valuable and sometimes unexpected benefits from it.

"NPC’s impact survey shows that many charities have to be ‘forced’ to assess their impact, but having done so find it helps them to improve their services. There is still a long way to go in getting charities to embrace impact measurement wholeheartedly, rather than seeing it as a burden."

UK Charities report that changing funding requirements have been the primary driver of increased investment in impact measurement over the last five years. There are other drivers—in particular, charities’ boards and senior management prioritising impact—but funders play a critical role in shaping behaviour.

The Charities say that a lack of funding for impact measurement is the main barrier to making progress. They are also concerned that funders generally have different reporting requirements, which are not aligned with the charities’ own needs.

The research found that different types of funders seem to drive different types of behaviour and practice among charities. UK Government funders are seen to have stringent requirements around measuring impact, but also to provide funding for evaluation. Trusts and foundations are viewed as having less strict requirements, but being supportive and encouraging in their approach to funding evaluation.

"We hope that this report and its findings will help both funders and charities to work together to turn impact measurement into an integral part of third sector activity," Corry said. 

The Making an Impact research also identifies key challenges with impact measurement, notably:

  • A quarter of charities (25%) say they do not measure their work at all. Small charities are less likely to measure impact than their larger counterparts: nearly half of charities with an income below £100,000 do not measure at all.
  • Funding is seen to be the greatest barrier. Nearly two thirds of funders (64%) are not perceived to build evaluation support into their funding.

The research was funded by The Big Lottery Fund, The Cabinet Office, Barrow Cadbury Trust, The Northern Rock Foundation, Paul Hamlyn Foundation and The City Bridge Trust.

In Australia, the most recent research published on Impact Measurement was by Assoc Professor Gianni Zappala and Mark Lyons in a background paper for the Centre for Social Impact in 2009 called Recent approaches to measuring social impact in the Third sector: an overview.

At the time the study found overall that although a minority of organisations are collecting outcome and results data, very few have internal evaluation staff, even fewer use external evaluators, most are not using Logic models, and very few receive funding to undertake evaluations.

At the time, the researchers said that while similar large scale studies of the evaluation practices of Not for Profit organizations do not exist for Australia, they know that many of the Not for Profit organisations in the social assistance (previously community services) industry continue to use many older evaluation techniques and indeed many are enjoying a new lease of life.

The researchers said this is particularly the case in the large social assistance Not for Profits (i.e. those with an annual turnover over $20 million), and especially those that have developed strong partnerships with large corporations.

Today, Assoc Professor Zappala says Australia is seeing a slow and steady increase in organisations interested in Social Return on Investment (SROI) however no where near the levels seen in the UK.

Assoc Prof Zappala says there is now legislation in the UK, introduced this year, that creates more incentive for Not for Profits to measure their impact.

He says in the training course he delivers for the Centre for Social Impact “Demonstrating Social Impact” is attracting high level participants who are facilitating SROI skills into their organisations.

As well he says a national Social Impact Network will be launched in December which is aimed at broadening interest in SROI.

Download the UK report



Guide to Giving

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....

Moores

Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

More Suppliers


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

NFPs Driving WA Economy, Report Says

Wendy Williams

Wednesday, 15th February 2017 at 4:20 pm

Study into the Effect of the NDIS on Carers

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 25th January 2017 at 9:26 am

Survey Reveals Australian Attitudes to Torture in Conflict

Lina Caneva

Tuesday, 6th December 2016 at 3:05 pm

Indigenous Advocate Named 2016 Telstra Business Woman of the Year

Lina Caneva

Tuesday, 22nd November 2016 at 12:30 pm

POPULAR

Moves to Stop Volunteering at Overseas Orphanages

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 1:54 pm

Future Uncertain for Disability Organisations Following Funding Cuts

Wendy Williams

Tuesday, 19th September 2017 at 8:29 am

Majority of NFPs Are Not Believed to be Well-Run, According to New Survey

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 12th September 2017 at 4:14 pm

More Australians Are Giving Time Not Money

Wendy Williams

Monday, 11th September 2017 at 5:07 pm

One Comment

  • Jason M Quin Jason M Quin says:

    Thank you for promoting this important research.
    This is a conversation that needs greater engagement in Australia, though as pointed out, there are good signs and some exciting work going on around the country.
    However, we should be careful not to squander this momentum on a single approach, one that often externalises impact measurement – as the province of specialists, rather than as an internal capacity that reflects the nature of the organisation – and risks simplifying the complex, for the sake of expedience.
    At times, we reference progress in other societies, without delving into the richness of the debate that accompanies the industry. The quickest path between two points is rarely the most fulfilling.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Guide to Giving
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!