Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  |  Policy

Court Decision on Charity Payments Reserved


31 October 2012 at 9:26 am
Staff Reporter
Legal experts claim that millions of charity dollars are potentially at stake due to a Melbourne City Council (MCC) appeal in the Supreme Court where the judge’s decision has been reserved to a future date.


Staff Reporter | 31 October 2012 at 9:26 am


0 Comments


 Print
Court Decision on Charity Payments Reserved
31 October 2012 at 9:26 am

Legal experts claim that millions of charity dollars are potentially at stake due to a Melbourne City Council (MCC) appeal in the Supreme Court where the judge’s decision has been reserved to a future date.

PilchConnect, a legal service for the Not for Profit sector, says the MCC has sought to pocket funds directed to charities from court proceedings by challenging the power of Magistrates to require offenders to make financial contributions to charities.

PilchConnect says it opposed the MCC action after PilchConnect’s submission to provide expert advice to the court as ‘an amicus’ was successful (‘an amicus’ is the legal term for advice from persons that is not party to the case, but who volunteer to offer information to assist a court in deciding a matter before it).

PilchConnect’s Director, Juanita Pope said the outcome of the case will have a significant impact on the charitable sector.

The MCC appealed an August 2011 decision requiring an individual who pleaded guilty to breaching the Food Act to make a donation to St Vincent De Paul’s food van service.

“Someone has to stand up for the sector. Charities operate with limited resources to help communities and the disadvantaged. Where Courts can help charities, we should be supporting them,” Pope said.

Pope said there is a long tradition of Courts making orders that offenders pay funds to relevant charities or into a court fund for charities.

“This approach works for both charities, and for the rehabilitation of offenders, who are given the opportunity to make a meaningful contribution back to the community.

“The Magistrates’ Court has a broad power to impose special conditions when releasing an offender without conviction. Making a payment to a charity is a common special condition.”

PilchConnect was represented on a pro bono basis by Andrew Woods and Samuel Bird of Counsel and law firm Herbert Smith Freehills.

Justice Dixon reserved his decision to a date to be fixed.



PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au or download our contributor guidelines.

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Election mania: What should I do during caretaker?

Neil Pharaoh

Monday, 21st September 2020 at 4:24 pm

Close to 150,000 jobs at risk due to welfare cuts

Luke Michael

Tuesday, 15th September 2020 at 5:02 pm

JobSeeker recipients fear push back under poverty line

Maggie Coggan

Friday, 11th September 2020 at 4:51 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×