Go Salary
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD
News  |  Policy

Court Decision on Charity Payments Reserved


Wednesday, 31st October 2012 at 9:26 am
Staff Reporter
Legal experts claim that millions of charity dollars are potentially at stake due to a Melbourne City Council (MCC) appeal in the Supreme Court where the judge’s decision has been reserved to a future date.


Wednesday, 31st October 2012
at 9:26 am
Staff Reporter


0 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Court Decision on Charity Payments Reserved
Wednesday, 31st October 2012 at 9:26 am

Legal experts claim that millions of charity dollars are potentially at stake due to a Melbourne City Council (MCC) appeal in the Supreme Court where the judge’s decision has been reserved to a future date.

PilchConnect, a legal service for the Not for Profit sector, says the MCC has sought to pocket funds directed to charities from court proceedings by challenging the power of Magistrates to require offenders to make financial contributions to charities.

PilchConnect says it opposed the MCC action after PilchConnect’s submission to provide expert advice to the court as ‘an amicus’ was successful (‘an amicus’ is the legal term for advice from persons that is not party to the case, but who volunteer to offer information to assist a court in deciding a matter before it).

PilchConnect’s Director, Juanita Pope said the outcome of the case will have a significant impact on the charitable sector.

The MCC appealed an August 2011 decision requiring an individual who pleaded guilty to breaching the Food Act to make a donation to St Vincent De Paul’s food van service.

“Someone has to stand up for the sector. Charities operate with limited resources to help communities and the disadvantaged. Where Courts can help charities, we should be supporting them,” Pope said.

Pope said there is a long tradition of Courts making orders that offenders pay funds to relevant charities or into a court fund for charities.

“This approach works for both charities, and for the rehabilitation of offenders, who are given the opportunity to make a meaningful contribution back to the community.

“The Magistrates’ Court has a broad power to impose special conditions when releasing an offender without conviction. Making a payment to a charity is a common special condition.”

PilchConnect was represented on a pro bono basis by Andrew Woods and Samuel Bird of Counsel and law firm Herbert Smith Freehills.

Justice Dixon reserved his decision to a date to be fixed.




Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers?

Get in touch at news@probonoaustralia.com.au

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

It’s a digital world, but charities aren’t living in it

Maggie Coggan

Wednesday, 30th October 2019 at 5:34 pm

In the struggle to survive, you must get the basics right

David Crosbie

Thursday, 10th October 2019 at 8:52 am

An angel dressed as a plumber

Maggie Coggan

Saturday, 21st September 2019 at 12:00 pm

POPULAR

Our royal commission is not yet a safe place for people with disability

Emma Bennison

Wednesday, 6th November 2019 at 4:59 pm

Children with disability face bullying and exclusion in Aussie schools

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 30th October 2019 at 4:15 pm

Five charts on what a Newstart recipient really looks like

Contributor

Wednesday, 30th October 2019 at 3:56 pm

Rising rents creating a ‘time bomb’ of homelessness for older Australians

Luke Michael

Wednesday, 30th October 2019 at 5:17 pm

Go Salary
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!