CSI leaderboard ad
Close Search
null  |  Policy

Disability Groups Unite Against Mobility Allowance Cuts

21 March 2017 at 4:40 pm
Wendy Williams
Disability groups across the country have united in protest against proposed cuts that could leave people with disability without access to transport.

Wendy Williams | 21 March 2017 at 4:40 pm


Disability Groups Unite Against Mobility Allowance Cuts
21 March 2017 at 4:40 pm

Disability groups across the country have united in protest against proposed cuts that could leave people with disability without access to transport.

In a joint statement released on Tuesday, the group of more than 25 different organisations, called on senators to block the mobility allowance bill that is currently before the Senate.

They argued the current mobility allowance was already “inadequate” to cover the full cost of transport for many people.

“This bill will make things much harder, with very little savings for the government,” the group said in the statement.

“Any cuts to the mobility allowance will impact the capacity of many people to seek and retain employment and volunteering opportunities.

“This is exactly the opposite of what the NDIS [National Disability Insurance Scheme] is trying to achieve.”

Under the social services legislation amendment (transition mobility allowance to the National Disability Insurance Scheme) bill 2016 only those eligible for the NDIS would have access to transport funding.

According to the group, only 460,000 of the approximately two million people with disability of working age will be transitioning to the NDIS, which means the bill will impact many people with disability who will not have access to the NDIS, including people over the age of 65.

People with Disability Australia advocacy projects manager and Disabled People’s Organisations Australia representative Samantha French said the mobility allowance provided “vital transport funding for people with disability”.

“The changes, put forward by the federal government, will leave many people with disability without access to the transport they need to go to work, get an education and be a part of their communities,” French said.

She said people with disability needed more access to transport, not less.

“The mobility allowance goes some way to address the additional expenses for people with disability who can’t access public transport. This small amount recognises that for many people with disability, current transport is often not accessible, forcing them to rely on taxis,” she said.

“People with disability need more access to transport, not less. Until the government can provide a public transport system that is accessible for all people, transport support for people with disability who are forced to use other means is essential. The current allowance should be increased, not cut as this bill proposes.”

According to the group,  if passed, the bill will:

  • reduce transport support for people with disability
  • increase social isolation and reduce the ability for people with disability to contribute to the community
  • create further barriers to economic participation for people with disability, at a time when there are increasing obligations upon them to find and keep work
  • exacerbate the already considerable costs involved for people with disability entering or re-entering the workforce. These additional costs can outweigh the economic benefits of having a job and be a disincentive to looking for work.

French raised concerns that the bill could set a precedent of cutting essential supports that should be available for all people with disability across Australia.

“We are also concerned that this bill sets a precedent for further cuts to essential disability supports by restricting access to them only to people with disability who are eligible for the NDIS,” she said.

“All of our organisations, and the many people with disability we represent, call on Senators to vote no on this Bill and make sure that people with disability can access the transport they need to be part of the community.”

See the full statement here.

Wendy Williams  |  Editor  |  @WendyAnWilliams

Wendy Williams is a journalist specialising in the not-for-profit sector and broader social economy. She has been the editor of Pro Bono News since 2018.

PB Careers
Get your biweekly dose of news, opinion and analysis to keep you up to date with what’s happening and why it matters for you, sent every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

Got a story to share?

Got a news tip or article idea for Pro Bono News? Or perhaps you would like to write an article and join a growing community of sector leaders sharing their thoughts and analysis with Pro Bono News readers? Get in touch at or download our contributor guidelines.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The job of bringing Australia back from the brink

Joe Zabar

Tuesday, 26th May 2020 at 4:52 pm

What is the real cost of managing a government service or contract?

Neil Pharaoh

Wednesday, 20th May 2020 at 2:57 pm

Through no fault of their own

Augustine Zycher

Wednesday, 6th May 2020 at 7:11 pm


CSI leaderboard ad
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

We need your help.

Our COVID-19 coverage has driven our website traffic up by 250%. But we are seeing a huge fall in advertising, which is how we fund our free news service. This is hard for us to ask knowing how tough times are for everyone. But now is the time to show us you value our work.

 Make a contribution 

You have Successfully Subscribed!