NDIS Criterion
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Communities

Proposed Changes to Citizenship Not Good for Business


Wednesday, 9th August 2017 at 11:14 am
Lina Caneva, Editor
The Diversity Council Australia (DCA) says proposed changes to Australia’s citizenship process would “not be good for business”.


Wednesday, 9th August 2017
at 11:14 am
Lina Caneva, Editor


1 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Proposed Changes to Citizenship Not Good for Business
Wednesday, 9th August 2017 at 11:14 am

 

The Diversity Council Australia (DCA) says proposed changes to Australia’s citizenship process would “not be good for business”.

The not-for-profit workplace diversity and inclusion advisor to business argued against proposed changes to Australia’s citizenship processes in a submission to a Senate inquiry.

DCA said in its submission that business in Australia would be missing out on a great deal of talent if the government went ahead with a number of the proposed changes in the Citizenship Bill.

In June 2017 the Senate announced an inquiry into the Australian Citizenship Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures) Bill 2017.

Changes in the Bill include:

  • extending the waiting period for permanent residents from one year to “at least four years” before eligibility for citizenship;
  • increasing the English language requirement to qualify for Australian citizenship; and
  • widening ministerial discretion to deny citizenship in individual immigration cases.

DCA’s CEO Lisa Annese said: “Leading Australian businesses recognised the value that our rich multicultural and multilingual society provides.

“Migration has gifted Australia with a workforce that speaks over 300 languages and has a diverse range of skills and cultural competencies that leading organisations want,” Annese said.

“Organisations that effectively capitalise on the skills and talents of their culturally diverse workforces open up new business markets and can better understand and service an increasingly diverse client base.”

DCA said it was particularly concerned about the proposed language test in the Citizenship Bill.

“Employees working at our member organisation shared stories from their family’s migration experience with us. Australia would have missed out on a great deal of talent if the proposed language test was introduced previously,” Annese said.

“We don’t want to take that risk with future generations.”

DCA’s submission also said that increasing the general residence requirement for permanent residents from one to four years could place an additional burden on people who have entered Australia on temporary work or humanitarian visas, and also be a deterrent to skilled permanent residents who may leave Australia, rather than wait for citizenship.

“Moreover, the retrospective nature of these proposed changes is deeply unfair and jeopardises Australia’s reputation as a destination of choice for global talent,”Annese said.

“While DCA supports all Australians having a good grasp of English proficiency, we do not believe that an English language test is the best way to achieve this.

“Rather, DCA believes that investment in English language programs for migrants and refugees, as well as workplace programs to support inclusion, would be more conducive to achieving the desired goal of better enabling all citizens to fully participate in Australia’s social and economic activities.”

The inquiry received 481 submissions.

A submission by the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC) said it “strongly recommended that this Bill not be passed”.

“This Bill would unjustifiably affect refugees by further exacerbating the false link between refugees and terrorism,” the submission said.

“We note the amendment proposed by the government does not achieve the stated purpose if the claim of national security is the central premise for its raison d’etre. The amendment does not contain any evidence for this premise, particularly considering the fact that people are already in Australia on Permanent Resident visas, and there being extensive visa cancellation powers that currently exist.

ASRC said the new requirement for English language testing proposed in the Bill would disproportionately affect people seeking asylum, who have not had the privilege of access to education in their home country, which is often the case for marginalized sections of society.

“Imposing a stricter level of English competency that is arguably equivalent to university-level English requirements does not reflect the fact that there is ample evidence of the positive contribution of migrants to Australian society under existing requirements.”

The Senate inquiry is scheduled to deliver its report on the Bill by 4 September 2017.


Lina Caneva  |  Editor |  @ProBonoNews

Lina Caneva has been a journalist for more than 35 years, and Editor of Pro Bono Australia News since it was founded in 2000.

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

NGO Recruitment is Australia’s not-for-profit sector recru...

NGO Recruitment

HLB Mann Judd is a specialist Accounting and Advisory firm t...

HLB Mann Judd

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Culturally Diverse Women Locked Out of Leadership Roles, Research Says

Luke Michael

Thursday, 7th September 2017 at 4:38 pm

Diversity Reduces Community Fears – Study

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 16th August 2017 at 11:43 am

Older Refugees Have Most To Lose From Citizenship Changes

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 20th April 2017 at 3:10 pm

Teachers Not Equipped for Multicultural Classrooms

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 22nd March 2017 at 12:02 pm

POPULAR

Disability Advocacy Group Fights to Restore State Funding

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:37 am

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

Donors Looking for a Personalised Experience to Give More – Study

Lina Caneva

Wednesday, 8th November 2017 at 1:43 pm

One Comment

  • Ravi Khanna says:

    It will be unfair to those who spent 3-4 years on getting Masters orPhD degrees on student visa and then spent time to get PR and after waiting fir one year after PR, while spending more than 4 years in Australia, they are shown ineligible to apply . While bill is not passed, the Govt is not accepting applications in the current eligibility criteria. This is very sad.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


NDIS Criterion
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!