Good 360
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES FOR THE COMMON GOOD
NEWS  |  Politics

Hanson Faces Backlash Over ‘Divisive’ Maiden Speech


Thursday, 15th September 2016 at 4:56 pm
Wendy Williams, Journalist
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has come under fire for the “crude, divisive, ill-informed Islamophobic rhetoric” that formed part of her maiden speech to the Australian Senate.

Thursday, 15th September 2016
at 4:56 pm
Wendy Williams, Journalist


2 Comments


FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

 Print
Hanson Faces Backlash Over ‘Divisive’ Maiden Speech
Thursday, 15th September 2016 at 4:56 pm

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has come under fire for the “crude, divisive, ill-informed Islamophobic rhetoric” that formed part of her maiden speech to the Australian Senate.

Senate Interior

 

Muslim leaders and politicians have united to reject Hanson’s call for a ban on immigration and her claim Australia was “at risk of being swamped by Muslims”.

Echoing fears aired in her 1996 address about multiculturalism, she claimed in the Senate on Wednesday that Australians were “fearful” and cited, without evidence, that organised crime rates were higher among Muslim populations.

“Islam cannot have a significant presence in Australia if we are to live in an open, secular and cohesive society,” Hanson said.

“We have seen the destruction that it is causing around the world. If we do not make changes now, there will be no hope in the future. Have no doubt that we will be living under sharia law and treated as second-class citizens with second-class rights if we keep heading down the path with the attitude, ‘She’ll be right, mate.’”

The president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, Keysar Trad, said the speech displayed ignorance about Islam and he commended the prime minister for “showing leadership and a positive direction for Australian society in rejecting Hanson’s divisive rhetoric”.

“In her maiden speech in the Senate, Pauline Hanson made wild allegations and grossly exaggerated generalisations against Islam and Australian Muslims,” Trad said.

“Her words were ill-informed, hurtful, divisive and create tremendous concern for Muslim Australians and Australian society.

“Ms Hanson’s comments confound the dictates of the conscience of every decent Australian, such comments are divisive, harmful to Australian society and embarrassing to our senate and our nation.”

Her comments sparked members of the Greens to walk out less than halfway through the speech.

Greens leader Richard Di Natale later tweeted: “Racism has no place in parliament but that is what we have just heard from Senator Hanson. I stand with those people hurt by her words.”

However former prime minister John Howard told ABC TV Hanson was entitled to be treated in a respectful fashion by the rest of parliament.

“In relation to Pauline Hanson, the mistake that was made 20 years ago of trying to demonise her and demonise her supporters should not be repeated,” Howard said.

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop told the ABC that Hanson had “rightly taken her seat in the Senate” and was entitled to her views.

“I disagree with many of them, as would other Australians,” Bishop said.

“But one of the strengths of this country is that we do believe in freedom of speech, we believe in open debate and the opportunity to debate dissenting voices.”

Australian Multicultural Foundation executive director Dr B (Hass) Dellal AO told Pro Bono Australia News that politicians should provide solutions and not “just give general rhetoric”.

“I’m not going to attack her [Hanson], she has been appointed to parliament as a senator and you have got to respect that,” Dellal said.

“But I think at the same time we need to understand that elected politicians should lead and should provide solutions, and I’m not hearing any solutions, all I’ve heard really is a mirror speech of 1996 replacing Aborigines and Asians for Muslims… but no solutions.”

Dellal said politicians should focus on preserving social cohesion.

“Australia has always been a draw card for those with imagination and the capacity to work hard, seize opportunities and build something new,” he said.

“Generations of migrants from all over the world have come here to create a better future for themselves and their children.

“So Australia’s future prosperity will depend on its ability to maintain social cohesion while significantly increasing population through immigration intakes.

“That is obviously going to involve a greater level of managing and understanding of cultural diversity than ever before and in the interest of the nation… so the question we should be looking at is how do we actually… preserve social cohesion and how do we strengthen that. Because social cohesion comes under threat when there are increasing levels of fear and misunderstandings within the community and divisions and that’s what you don’t want and I think this is what we are hearing in some of this rhetoric.”

He said the Australian multicultural experience was a reality.

“Of course we have challenges, but I don’t believe it will be at the demise of our society because the Australian multicultural experience is a reality, that’s a fact, it is not a vision, much less an ideology or creed, it describes societies like Australia, as they are, and as they are destined to be,” he said.

“It is the institution of Australian democracy that enables that diversity in our society to flourish. It’s important to highlight it is being built on evolving values of Australian democracy and citizenship… these are the sorts of things that our leaders should be talking about.

“What you want is politicians working together and if there are issues we need to ensure that there is an understanding that there are challenges and issues and we need to resolve it.

“You don’t want to create divisions within our political leadership as well as divisions within our community.

“It is easy to make these sorts of remarks that are emotional or emotive, because all that does is create animosity… it is important to ensure you are representing the views of all Australians, it is important that you don’t tarnish everyone with the same brush.”

Dellal highlighted that the Australian Muslim Community was not homogenous.

“It is so diverse,” he said.

“It is close to 30 to 40 different nationalities and ethnic groups, all with different levels of religiosity and… that is never translated or actually seen in our media or in our public discussion. That diversity within the Australian muslim community is never properly acknowledged because if you were able to understand that then you would see how people have integrated and their roles in terms of Australian Muslims and the role they play as law abiding citizens.

“So you need to demonstrate all that so you take away the fears, because with the challenges there is also so many good things, that in fact outweighs the negative, by 100 to one.

“It’s really important that we understand that diversity has enriched all our lives, we can all agree to that, but it also pushes each and everyone of us to accept a different reality from our own and that’s the challenge.

“We need good leadership around that so that people can understand that by creating fear or misunderstanding or fear of the unknown, creates further barriers, you need to break down those barriers.

“If you are arguing the fact that you want people to integrate, then if you remove those barriers then people will integrate but if you create barriers of fear they also are fearful of integrating because they don’t know how they are going to be responded to.”


Wendy Williams  |  Journalist |  @ProBonoNews

Wendy Williams is a journalist specialising in the Not for Profit sector.

FEATURED SUPPLIERS


Helping the helpers fund their mission…...

FrontStream Pty Ltd (FrontStream AsiaPacific)

...


Yes we’re lawyers, but we do a lot more....

Moores

Brennan IT helps not-for-profit (NFP) organisations drive gr...

Brennan IT

More Suppliers

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Senate Vote to Increase Income Support Payments Fails

Lina Caneva

Monday, 14th August 2017 at 4:20 pm

Different Does Not Mean Bad

Bill Gamack

Friday, 23rd June 2017 at 9:47 am

Calls to Abandon Cashless Welfare Card Voted Down in Senate

Wendy Williams

Monday, 19th June 2017 at 4:49 pm

Senate Support for Legal  Assistance Funding

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 30th March 2017 at 4:39 pm

POPULAR

Red Cross Moves to Wage-Based Fundraising Model

Lina Caneva

Thursday, 16th November 2017 at 8:30 am

Disability Advocacy Group Fights to Restore State Funding

Luke Michael

Thursday, 9th November 2017 at 8:37 am

Concerns Raised Over New ACNC Board Appointments

Luke Michael

Monday, 20th November 2017 at 2:28 pm

New Same-Sex Marriage Bill Looks to Protect Faith-Based Charities

Luke Michael

Monday, 13th November 2017 at 5:25 pm

2 Comments

  • Leigh Oats says:

    I know that it’s a popular remark, but it bears repetition: Australia is at risk of being swamped by bogans.

    And one of the said bogans speaks as if English isn’t her native language.

    Let’s have an English-language test for people who seek to warm a seat in any of the parliaments of Australia.

  • Tibor says:

    I really do not believe that Pauline Hanson is a racist in her views. Having met her in person I found her to be quite a nice person. Many of us share her concerns even though we do not vote for her party. We would like immigrants to assimilate and do have valid objections to paying for Halal certification on or food. This does not mean that we discriminate against immigrants. I come from an immigrant family and do understand this issue having experienced discrimination on many levels while growing up here. However we accepted the Australian way of life and culture and I would only describe myself as Australian although born overseas. I do believe that regardless of a persons race, religion etc , our Government should allow in only those people who have the best chance of accepting our way of life and culture and not those who want to change us to suit their values and way of life. This is not discrimination but protecting our population to preserve their way of life. One only has to look at what has happened in places like the UK and Europe in recent times to see why this is necessary to preserve our standards and way of life.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Good 360
pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook

Get the social sector's most essential news coverage. Delivered free to your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

You have Successfully Subscribed!